Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology
. 2019 Aug 5;29(8):315–324. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20180039

The LEAD (Lung, Heart, Social, Body) Study: Objectives, Methodology, and External Validity of the Population-Based Cohort Study

Robab Breyer-Kohansal 1,*, Sylvia Hartl 2,*, Otto Chris Burghuber 3, Matthias Urban 1, Andrea Schrott 1, Alvar Agusti 4, Torben Sigsgaard 5, Claus Vogelmeier 6, Emiel Wouters 7, Michael Studnicka 8, Marie-Kathrin Breyer 1
PMCID: PMC6614076  PMID: 30344197

Abstract

Background

The Lung, hEart, sociAl, boDy (LEAD) Study (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01727518; http://clinicaltrials.gov) is a longitudinal, observational, population-based Austrian cohort that aims to investigate the relationship between genetic, environmental, social, developmental and ageing factors influencing respiratory health and comorbidities through life. The general working hypothesis of LEAD is the interaction of these genetic, environmental and socioeconomic factors influences lung development and ageing, the risk of occurrence of several non-communicable diseases (respiratory, cardiovascular, metabolic and neurologic), as well as their phenotypic (ie, clinical) presentation.

Methods

LEAD invited from 2011–2016 a random sample (stratified by age, gender, residential area) of Vienna inhabitants (urban cohort) and all the inhabitants of six villages from Lower Austria (rural cohort). Participants will be followed-up every four years. A number of investigations and measurements were obtained in each of the four domains of the study (Lung, hEart, sociAl, boDy) including data to screen for lung, cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, osteoporosis, and cognitive function. Blood and urine samples are stored in a biobank for future investigations.

Results

A total of 11.423 males (47.6%) and females (52.4%), aged 6–80 years have been included in the cohort. Compared to governmental statistics, the external validity of LEAD with respect to age, gender, citizenship, and smoking status was high.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the LEAD cohort has been established following high quality standards; it is representative of the Austrian population and offers a platform to understand lung development and ageing as a key mechanism of human health both in early and late adulthood.

Key words: population based cohort, epidemiology, respiratory diseases

INTRODUCTION

Chronic respiratory diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, are among the most prevalent, severe and costly human diseases. COPD currently is the 4th cause of death worldwide and it is expected to be the 3rd in a decade.1 It affects about 10% of the adult population in European countries. However, estimates in Austria almost triple that figure.2,3 Tobacco smoking is the main risk factor for COPD in developed countries but recent epidemiological studies indicate that about a quarter of individuals with chronic airflow limitation are never-smokers, and that early life events can also contribute to its pathogenesis.4 The influence of other environmental exposures either at work or at home, in urban and rural populations, is unclear.5 Likewise, asthma is the most prevalent chronic disease in childhood and affects about 5% of the population (children and adults).6 It is estimated that there are 300 million asthma patients worldwide.7

Recently, attention has focused on lung developmental issues during pregnancy, infancy, and adolescence as important drivers of respiratory diseases later in life.8 Both genetic9 and environmental factors, such as active10 and passive smoking,11 environmental pollution,12 recurrent bronchopulmonary infections,13 socioeconomic status,14 occupation, and diet, can alter normal lung. Low birth-weight is associated with lower lung function later in life.15,16 Yet, the potential elements and pathogenic mechanisms that control and influence lung development are not well established.13,17,18 The Framingham cohort study, among others, has shown that suboptimal lung function is the best predictor of respiratory and, of note, cardiovascular health during adulthood,19 but the relationship between respiratory health and other health conditions is unclear.20

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the major global health problem of the XXI century.21 NCD’s are caused by complex gene-environment interactions across the lifespan, from fetus to old age22,23 and include, among others, chronic respiratory diseases, cardiovascular diseases, metabolic diseases, osteoporosis, and neuropsychiatric diseases. NCDs often coexist in the same patient.24 For instance, cardiovascular diseases, skeletal muscle dysfunction, osteoporosis, metabolic syndrome, and depression are highly prevalent in patients with COPD25 and contribute significantly to limit their quality of life and prognosis.2630 Asthma is also associated with increased prevalence of comorbidities, albeit they frequently remain undiagnosed.31

The LEAD (Lung, hEart, sociAl, boDy) study (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01727518; http://clinicaltrials.gov) is a longitudinal, observational, population-based cohort that aims to investigate the relationship between genetic, environmental, developmental, and ageing factors influencing respiratory health and comorbidities through life. The general working hypothesis of LEAD is that the interaction of gene-environmental and socioeconomic factors influences lung development, the risk of occurrence of several major respiratory and cardiovascular diseases and other NCD’s, as well as their phenotypic (ie, clinical) presentation. Accordingly, the general goal of LEAD is to provide valid scientific information that contributes to better understand how genetic, environmental and socioeconomic factors influence: (1) the normal and pathologic lung growth, development and ageing (ie, the natural history of lung function in normal and pathological conditions); (2) the risk of development of major NCD’s like COPD, asthma, cardiovascular diseases, metabolic diseases (as diabetes and metabolic syndrome), osteoporosis, and neuropsychiatric diseases (mental disorders including anxiety, depression and impaired cognitive function); and, (3) the phenotypic heterogeneity and complex of chronic respiratory diseases, COPD in particular, and their relation with coexisting comorbidities. Within this general framework, different specific projects of LEAD will develop their own working hypothesis and specific goals in four domains (Lung, hEart, sociAl, boDy). Here, we describe in detail the methodology used and the external validity (ie, representativeness of the general Austrian population) of LEAD.

METHODS

Ethics

The local Ethics committee of Vienna approved the study (protocol number: EK-11-117-0711). Participants signed informed consent; those for children under the age of 18 had to be signed by their parents/legal representative.

Study design

LEAD (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01727518; http://clinicaltrials.gov) is a longitudinal, observational, population based cohort study with stratified samples from Vienna (urban population) and Lower Austria (rural population). Recruitment and first study visit started in February 2012 and finished in September 2016. A flow chart with numbers for initial recruitment, inclusion, and main measurements is presented as Figure 1. In total, 11,423 male and female, aged 6–80 years participated and completed the first visit, including main measurements as described in detail in Table 1.

Figure 1. Flow chart of study population including invitation, inclusion, and main measurements.

Figure 1.

Table 1. Measurements and methods used in LEAD.

Measurement Description Equipment
Demographics and Anthropometrics

  Age, Gender, Height, Weight, waist circumference Questionnaire
  Socioeconomic status (Income, education, occupation, religion, migration) Questionnaire
  Community (Urban/Rural)  
  height, weight, waist circumference  
Pregnancy test (female, 12–60 years) Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in urine Alere HCG R-20™

Birth and infancy data

  Birth-weight Questionnaire
  Prematurity Questionnaire
  Diseases and co-morbidities in family (non-communicable diseases, Allergy/Atopy) Questionnaire
  Other: father/mother’s socioeconomic status, migration status, life-style, smoking history (pre-, peri- and post-pregnancy) Questionnaire

Exposures

  Individual smoking (Pack years, age start/quit smoking) Questionnaire
Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS): parents, grandparents, friends
Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS): at home, school, work
  Data from the Environment Agency Austria of 17 monitoring units have been used in a calculated emission/combustion model for average concentrations of particulate matter 10 (PM10) and Nitrogen oxide (NOX) within 10 m3 of every participant’s home and work place address Calculation model of the Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics, Graz University of Technology, Austria and the Municipal Department for Environmental Protection of Vienna48

Allergies

Skin-prick test49 Skin prick with allergens for ash tree, tree pollens mix (hazel, alder, birch), 5-grass-mix, mugwort, ragweed, ribwort, mites mix, Alternaria, dog and cat dander ALK-Abelló Allergie-Service G.m.b.H.

Domain Lung

Respiratory symptoms · Wheezing  
· Breathlessness
· Sputum
· Cough
  Ever diagnoses of Asthma, COPD, other respiratory diseases Questionnaire
Spirometry Pre- and post-bronchodilation Carl Rainer GmbH, Austria™
Body plethysmography Pre- and post-bronchodilation Carl Rainer GmbH, Austria™
Oscillatory resistance from visit 2 Post bronchodilation Resmon™ Pro Forced Oscillation Technique
Diffusing capacity, DLCO from visit 2 Single-breath post bronchodilation Carl Rainer GmbH, Austria™

Domain hEart

  Ever diagnoses of angina pectoris, stroke, congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, other cardiovascular diseases Questionnaire
Arterial blood pressure50 By Sphygmomanometer Hokanson S12™ and DS400 Aneroid™
12-lead electrocardiogram51 Cardiac infarction injury score Cardiosoft, GE Healthcare®, Austria
Non-invasive applanation tonometry52 Arterial stiffness by carotid femoral-pulse wave velocity (PWV) and Augmentation time Index by pulse wave analysis (PWA) Spygmocor, Novomed®, Austria
Ankle-brachial index53 By sphygmomanometer and Doppler probe at upper and the lower extremities ELCAT® GmbH, Germany

Domain SociAl

LEAD questionnaire children (age 6–10 years) Composed of:
1. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey54
2. ISAAC. The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood55
3. American Thoracic European Community Respiratory Health Survey56
adolescents (age 11–18 years)
adults (age 19–80 years)

Anxiety and Depression age 10–15 years Children Anxiety and Depression scale57
age >15 years Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale58
Quality of Life by questionnaire Study 12-item short form (SF-12) to assess health related quality of life55 Study 12-item short form (SF-12)59
Cognitive function by questionnaire  
age 15–70 years Perceptual speed intelligence test
age >70 years Mini Mental Status Test (MMST)

Domain boDy

Hand Grip Test60 Hand and forearm muscular strength Trailite, TL-LSC100™
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
DXA®
Fat and lean mass (upper limp, trunk, android, gynoid, lower limp), Bone Mineral Density (lumbar spine, femur)61 Lunar Prodigy, GE Healthcare®, USA
  Activity, diet, nutrition54 Questionnaire
  Ever diagnoses of diabetes, osteoporosis, other metabolic diseases Questionnaire

Biobank

Fasting venous blood sample Standard blood chemistry incl. differential, platelet count and Immunoglobulin E. Samplosophy® data matrix sample tube rack system
ISO 9001:2008 certified quality management system
Biobank storage at Biobank Medical University of Vienna 48 µl Frozen Serum, 40 µl Plasma, 20 µl Urine

LEAD is directed by a Steering Committee, consisting of four Austrian academic clinical physicians (Marie-Kathrin Breyer, Robab Breyer-Kohansal, Sylvia Hartl, and Otto Burghuber). An international advisory board of five international respiratory experts (Alvar Agusti, Torben Sigsgaard, Michael Studnicka, Claus Vogelmeier, and Emiel Wouters) was convened. All of them discussed and agreed on the design of the study and interpretation of the results and have full access to the LEAD database.

Recruitment strategy

For the urban cohort, we used the national inhabitants’ register to invite a randomized stratified sample (by age, gender, and residential area) of Vienna inhabitants to participate. For the rural cohort, due to the low total inhabitants’ number, every registered inhabitant of six villages from Lower Austria was invited. Selected urban and rural participants received a personalized invitation letter. If the selected person did not respond within 30 days, a maximum of two other personalized invitation letter were sent at regular intervals. Due to the national Austrian data protection act, we did not have access to information on other contact details (eg, telephone number). Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, current breast feeding, or poor German language skills. Individuals participated voluntarily without any reimbursement.

Follow-up

Every participant will be assessed every 4 years from individual’s first study visit with all measurements described in detail in Table 1. In case of loss to follow-up, the national inhabitants’ register provides information on emigration or death. As the study is designed longitudinally, the numbers of loss to follow-up will be substituted with re-recruitment (by age, gender, and residential area).

Measurements

All measurements were performed at the LEAD study centre of the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for COPD and Respiratory Epidemiology at the Otto Wagner Hospital in Vienna, Austria. Table 1 details all measurements obtained in each participant according to her/his age. To screen for major NCD’s, a number of investigations and measurements were obtained in each of the four domains of the study (Lung, hEart, sociAl, boDy), as detailed in Table 1 and only briefly discussed below. Blood and urine samples were analyzed for routine clinical measurements and stored in a biobank for future investigations.

Lung domain

Lung function measures included pre- and post-bronchodilation spirometry and static lung volumes, effort-independent measures of oscillatory resistance, and carbon monoxide lung diffusing capacity (DLCO). Measurements were obtained according to international recommendations32 and reference values used correspond to those of the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI).33 Skin Prick Tests for major allergens (see Table 1) were obtained in every participant. Smoking history and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) was recorded. History of respiratory diseases, allergy, and related medication from the individual and spouses, as well as respiratory symptoms, were collected using a questionnaire.

To investigate COPD and asthma in more detail, a subgroup of participants was invited for additional measurements. Every participant with a positive Skin Prick Test or doctor-diagnosed asthma or allergy or elevated blood eosinophils was re-invited for bronchial provocation and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) testing and an Asthma Control TestTM (subgroup 1). Every participant with an forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) below Lower Limits of Normal by GLI33 or below 70% was re-invited for a 6-minute walking test, COPD and health related questionnaires, and Alpha 1-Antitrypsin testing (subgroup 2). Details are explained in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Flow chart for additional measurements. FeNO Fractional exhaled Nitric Oxide; FEV1 forced expiratory volume in the first second; VC Vital capacity; LLN lower limit of normal. References: Six-minute walking test (6 MWT)62 expressed as a percentage of the predicted distance63 and perceived dyspnoea using the modified BORG dyspnoea scale.64 CAT test; http://www.catestonline.org; 36-item short form (SF-36).65 ACT; https://www.asthmacontroltest.com/.

Figure 2.

HEart domain

Cardiovascular measurements included arterial blood pressure, automated electrocardiogram, carotid femoral-pulse wave velocity, and blood pressure measurements at both the upper and the lower extremities. History of cardiovascular diseases and events and related medication from the individual and spouses were collected using a questionnaire.

SociAl domain

To evaluate environmental risk factors for chronic respiratory diseases, data from the Environment Agency Austria of seventeen monitoring units was used to determine the average concentrations of particulate matter 10 (PM10) and Nitrogen oxide (NOX) within 10 m3 of every participant’s home and workplace. A map showing the monitoring units in Vienna and the average exposure on PM10 and NOx in the year 2015 is presented as Figure 3. Socioeconomic status (income, education, occupation) of the individual or parents/legal representative (if underage) was collected. To study the presence of neuropsychiatric diseases such as anxiety, depression, and impaired cognitive function, we used standardized questionnaires and test modules (as detailed in Table 1).

Figure 3. Monitoring units in Vienna, Austria and average PM 10 and NOX in the year 2015 [Reference from the following source: City of Vienna, Municipal Department MA 22 - Environmental Protection].

Figure 3.

BoDy domain

To determine the presence of diabetes and metabolic syndrome, we measured fasting glucose in peripheral venous blood, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body mass index, waist circumference, fat mass/fat free mass, blood lipid profiles, and blood pressure. The presence of osteoporosis was determined using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. History of diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and osteoporosis and related medication from the individual and spouses were collected using a questionnaire.

Quality control

To guarantee optimal quality of the whole process, the following measures were implemented from scratch: (1) all clinical examiners (medical students) were trained by senior staff (medical doctors/lung function technicians) and were supervised regularly; (2) standardized protocols were predetermined for every single measurement, based on international standards; (3) all questionnaires are interview based; (4) a web-tool was designed (www.linkthat.eu) that included control mechanism, which permits inconclusive data entry (eg, typing errors, implausible numbers), and all data from study equipment is uploaded directly by data transfer to avoid manual data input errors; (5) study monitoring is performed periodically and included extensive plausibility checks as well as regular monitoring reports of the interim data set; and, (6) special emphasis is placed on quality control of every measurement report, including a rigorous post hoc quality control of all original measurements by the steering committee.

External validity

To determine the “representativeness” of the population included in LEAD compared to the Austrian population, we did extensive external validity testing. First, we compared LEAD results with those the most recent Austrian population data published by the Governmental Statistic Department in 2015.34 Second, the LEAD study population was compared with the Austrian Governmental Microcensus in terms of age, gender citizenship, educational level, and smoking status.35,36 The Microcensus is a randomly chosen Austrian household’s survey (quarterly sampled), in males and females aged 15–80 years, depicting socio-demographic details and, in a subsample, self-reported health status including smoking status. Due to the compulsory participation (denial punished by a fee) the Microcensus survey has a very high response rate (>99%) and high reliability.

Statistical analysis

For this manuscript, continuous data are described using arithmetic means, standard deviations (SD) and ranges; binary and ordinal data by frequencies and percentages. In general, the level of significance (α) was set to 5% (Bonferroni-Holm correction applied whenever necessary). To analyze external validity (“representativeness”) α was set to 0.1% (99.9% confidence intervals) to prevent wrongly significant results for confidence intervals caused only because of the large sample sizes. All statistical analyses have been performed using SPSS 24.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA).37

In future analysis of specific LEAD projects we plan to use knowledge-driven and data-driven (unbiased) analysis, including principal component analysis, cluster analysis, and network analysis, to understand the complexity and heterogeneity of the cohort and different subgroup of participants.22,38,39

RESULTS

Participants’ characteristics

Table 2 presents the major baseline characteristics of the LEAD study cohort stratified by age. We included 1.344 children age 6 ≤ 18 years (male 54.4%) and 10,079 adults ≥18 years (male 46.65%). Smoking exposure was high since almost one fifth of children aged 6 ≤ 18 years had been exposed to environmental tobacco smoke and more than half of the adult participants were former or current smokers (56%). Former male smokers have a higher exposure to cigarette smoke compared to current smokers; therefore, we stratified all smokers using pack years (PY) showing that 19.5% have or have had a high cigarette consumption (>20 PY). All in all, most participants (86.9%) have any history of tobacco smoke exposure (passive and/or active).

Table 2. Baseline characteristics LEAD study cohort, stratified by age and gender.

  Children (6–<18 years) Adults (≥18 years)
N = 1,345 N = 10,078


Male Female Male Female
N = 732 N = 613 N = 4,701 N = 5,377


Mean (SD)
(N missing, if any)
Mean (SD)
(N missing, if any)
Mean (SD)
(N missing, if any)
Mean (SD)
(N missing, if any)
Height, cm 152.3 (20.3) 149.6 (15.9) 177.5 (7.1) 164.2 (6.6)
Weight, kg 46.8 (19.3) 44.1 (15.3) 84.5 (14.2) 68.1 (14.0)
BMI, kg/m2 19.3 (4.1) 19.1 (3.9) 26.8 (4.3) 25.3 (5.2)
Waist circumference, cm 69.9 (12.4) (1) 68.3 (10.9) (1) 97.4 (12.7) (6) 88.5 (13.6) (14)

Smoking status % [CI; 95%]
(N missing, if any)
% [CI; 95%]
(N missing, if any)
% [CI; 95%]
(N missing, if any)
% [CI; 95%]
(N missing, if any)

Never, % 96.6 [95.3–97.9] 97.1 [95.8–98.4] 38.1 [36.7–39.5] 49.1 [47.8–50.4]
Former, % 0.1 [0.0–0.3] 0.2 [0.0–0.6] 35.8 [34.4–37.2] 28.8 [27.6–30.0]
 Pack years     22.8 (27.3) (10) 14.5 (18.7) (10)
Current, % 3.3 [2.0–4.6] 2.8 [1.5–4.1] 26.1 [24.8–27.4] 22.0 [20.9–23.1]
 Pack years 1.3 (1.5) (2) 0.6 (0.9) 20.0 (21.3) (8) 16.0 (16.0) (10)
Former and currents smokers with <20 pack years, % 3.2 [1.9–4.5] (2) 2.9 [1.6–4.2] 36.8 [35.4–38.2] (18) 36.1 [34.8–37.4] (20)
Former and currents smokers with ≥20 pack years, % none none 25.0 [23.8–26.2] (18) 14.6 [13.7–15.5] (20)
Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) at most days and/or
nights of week for several hours
       
In adolescents, % 17.8 [15.0–20.6] (2) 19.7 [16.6–22.8] 38.2 [36.8–39.6] 39.4 [38.1–40.7]
In adulthood, % 46.4 [45.0–47.8] (10) 49.5 [48.2–50.8] (7)

BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.

External validity

Compared to other epidemiological studies,40 the overall response rate in LEAD was low (total 8.7%, male: 7.7%, female 9.8%). The low participation rate is probably related to the very rigorous Austrian data protection law that prohibits iterative invitations and/or telephone contact. The LEAD study is a single-centered investigation, with participants having long travel to have examinations (no monetary incentive). As residential area was part of the recruitment strategy, a homogenous weighted proportional population sample of various Viennese districts had to be guaranteed. When comparing participation rates between Lower Austria, districts far away and nearby the LEAD study center, no difference were found (8.7% vs 6.5% vs 7.1%; all P-values non-significant). It is known, that participation rates in health surveys decreased over the past decades,40 and the considered personal benefit participating in a health survey in Austria may be low due to the high provision of health care. Despite this, the external validity (“representativeness”) of the LEAD cohort is very high. Table 3 shows that the demographic characteristics of LEAD participants are almost identical to those of the general Austrian population, stratified by age and gender. On the other hand, Table 4 compares the sociodemographic data (citizenship and educational level) of the LEAD cohort (15–80 years) with that of the Austrian Governmental Microcensus (15–80 years). The LEAD cohort was very similar in terms of citizenship but not in terms of educational level, which was shifted towards higher education. Finally, it is important to note that the smoking history of the LEAD study cohort was well matched with the results from the Austrian Microcensus both, in male and female participants (Figure 4).

Table 3. LEAD study cohort compared to Austrian population, stratified by age and gender.

Age groups
(years)
MALE FEMALE


LEAD cohort
n = 5,433
Austrian population
n = 3,883,829
P LEAD cohort
n = 5,990
Austrian population
n = 3,932,930
P




n % [99.9% CI] % n % [99.9% CI] %
6–<10 306 5.6 [4.3–6.9] 4.3 n.s. 233 3.9 [3.0–4.8] 4.1 n.s.
10–<20 546 10.0 [8.6–11.4] 11.8 ≤0.01 522 8.7 [7.4–10.0] 10.8 ≤0.01
20–<30 698 12.8 [11.2–14.4] 15.1 ≤0.01 806 13.5 [12.0–15.0] 14.2 n.s.
30–<40 756 13.9 [12.3–15.5] 15.0 n.s. 784 13.1 [11.6–14.6] 14.5 n.s.
40–<50 885 16.3 [14.5–18.1] 16.7 n.s. 1.077 18.0 [16.3–19.7] 16.5 n.s.
50–<60 877 16.1 [14.4–17.8] 16.8 n.s. 1.034 17.3 [15.6–19.0] 16.7 n.s.
60–<70 810 14.9 [13.2–16.6] 11.5 ≤0.01 967 16.1 [14.4–17.8] 12.4 ≤0.01
≥70 555 10.2 [8.8–11.6] 8.9 n.s. 567 9.5 [8.1–10.9] 10.9 n.s.

CI, confidence interval; n.s., not significant; P, P-value.

Table 4. Sociodemographics of LEAD study cohort compared to Microcensus.

  LEAD cohort Austrian Microcensus  


n % [99.9% CI] % [99.9% CI] P
Citizenship        
 Austria 10,099 88.5 [87.5–89.5] 88.6 [87.4–89.8] n.s.
 Foreign 1,307 11.5 [10.5–12.5] 11.4 [10.2–12.6] n.s.
 Missing 17      
Education LEAD cohort 15–80 years
(n = 10.420)
   
 No education 182 1.7 [1.5–2.0] 1.1 [0.7–1.5] ≤0.01
 Primary/lower secondary
education
1,317 12.7 [12.0–13.3] 22.9 [21.3–24.5] ≤0.01
 Finished apprenticeship/
vocational training
3,269 31.4 [30.5–32.3] 50.6 [48.7–52.5] ≤0.01
 High school 2,769 26.6 [25.8–27.5] 14.0 [12.7–15.3] ≤0.01
 University level 2,867 27.6 [26.7–28.4] 11.4 [10.2–12.6] ≤0.01
 Missing 16      

CI, confidence interval; n.s., not significant; P, P-value.

Figure 4. Smoking status LEAD study cohort compared to microcensus.

Figure 4.

Limitations

1. To obtain all measurements in the entire study population including valid lung function testing (bodyplethysmography in particular) for proper comparability throughout age groups, only participants ≥6 years could be included. In addition, radiation exposure by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is prohibited in those <6 years of age. Therefore, first infant years of lung function development will not be available in this study.

2. Information on individual’s early life exposure like birth history, childhood respiratory infections, diagnoses, and maternal/paternal data on occupational exposure, migration, life style, and smoking behavior are documented only via questionnaires and retrospectively in those <18 years. The validity is demonstrated by the accompanying parents at the study visit. In those >18 years this information may be lacking due to individual’s memory (gap) or nescience.

3. The LEAD cohort shows higher education levels compared to the general Austrian population. This is a well-known challenge within populational based studies based on voluntary participation.41 Education is a well described and recognized factor on lung function, in both childhood and adulthood.42 This weakness is addressed as a major limitation within the LEAD cohort. To at least reduce this effect the authors will define recommended individual’s (for adults) and mothers/fathers (for children) socioeconomic status, including education, occupation, and income.43

DISCUSSION

The ongoing LEAD study includes a large and carefully characterized cohort representative for the general population of Austria with respect to age, gender, and smoking status. The high quality of the dataset is guaranteed by the protocol based standard measurements, the trained personnel and interview based questionnaires obtained in all participants, through the direct data transfer from the equipment into the study specific tailored web tool preventing manual data input errors, and through regular study monitoring reports, interim data sets, and plausibility checks. In addition, rigorous post hoc quality control of every single measurement report is done by the steering committee.

The representativeness of the LEAD study cohort is supported by the comparison with the governmental data of the Austrian population that shows almost identical distribution of age, gender and citizenship. The shift towards higher education levels in the LEAD study cohort is also seen in other epidemiological studies, and is likely due to an increased health awareness of higher educated participants.44

The LEAD study has some clear strengths: (1) to our knowledge, it is among the biggest longitudinal population-based cohort studies providing pre- and post-bronchodilation spirometry and body plethysmography and diffusing capacity results to better characterize chronic respiratory disease as recommended by the European Respiratory Society45; (2) to validate prospectively lung function trajectories from infancy to late adulthood,4 the LEAD cohort included participants from 6 to 80 years, and most of the risk factors recently discussed13,46,47 have been considered in the analysis; (3) to study the impact of environmental factors on lung function, data from seventeen environmental monitoring units in Vienna calculate the average concentrations of particulate matter 10 (PM10) and Nitrogen oxide (NOX) within 10 m3 of every participant’s home and work place address using the emission and combustion model48; (4) to cover risk factors based on symptoms, socioeconomic status, smoking status, and self-rated general health, a LEAD study cohort tailored questionnaire was generated for different age groups based on validated questionnaires (for detailed information see Table 2). In addition, anxiety and depression, quality of life, and cognitive function were also evaluated; (5) to minimize recall bias for undiagnosed or self-reported coexisting diseases, the LEAD study measures key organ function data to screen for cardiovascular, metabolic, and body composition data for muscle/fat distribution as well as for osteoporosis and screening test for cognitive function. This approach provides a framework for the exploration of the relationships between lung health, age, and multi-morbidity in a broader context; and, finally, (6) LEAD has created a blood/urine biobank, hosted by the Medical University of Vienna, which is open to future international collaborations to better understand genetic risk factors and biomarkers influencing lung function development and decline.

In summary, the LEAD cohort has been established following high quality standards; it is representative of the Austrian population and offers a platform to understand lung development and ageing as a key mechanism of human health both, in early and late adulthood.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Authors thank all participants for their willingness to contribute to advanced medical science in the field of epidemiology, lung function development and decline. Special thanks to the whole LEAD study team, who worked every day for the high quality of the data obtained. Special thanks to Barbara Wögerbauer, who always stayed positive and optimistic and kept the team together for all the years.

This work was supported in part, by the Ludwig Boltzmann Society, Austrian Ministry of Health, Viennese hospital association, City of Vienna, and Medical University of Vienna.

Conflicts of interest: RBK gave presentations and/or served on scientific advisory boards sponsored by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, and Novartis. SH gave presentations at symposia and/or served on scientific advisory boards sponsored by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Glaxo Smith Kline, Menarini, MSD oncology, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, and Teva. OCB gave presentations at symposia and/or served on scientific advisory boards sponsored by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Glaxo Smith Kline, Menarini, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda. MU gave presentations at symposia and/or served on scientific advisory boards by Astra Zeneca, and Boehringer Ingelheim. AA gave presentations at symposia and/or served on scientific advisory boards sponsored by AstraZeneca, BIAL, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Esteve, Glaxo Smith Kline, Novartis, and Teva. CV gave presentations at symposia and/or served on scientific advisory boards sponsored by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cipla, CSL Behring, Chiesi, Glaxo Smith Kline, Grifols, Menarini, MedUpdate, Mundipharma, Novartis, Omniamed, and Teva. EW gave presentations at symposia and/or served on scientific advisory boards sponsored by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Glaxo Smith Kline, and Nycomed. MS gave presentations at symposia and/or served on scientific advisory boards sponsored by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Chiesi, Eli-Lilly, GSK, Menarini, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda. MKB gave presentations at symposia and/or served on scientific advisory boards sponsored by Chiesi, Easypharm, Ratiopharm, and Novartis.

All authors declare they have no conflict of interest with respect to this research study and paper.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lopez AD, Shibuya K, Rao C, et al. . Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current burden and future projections. Eur Respir J. 2006;27(2):397–412. 10.1183/09031936.06.00025805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Douglass AB, Bornstein R, Nino-Murcia G, et al. . The Sleep Disorders Questionnaire. I: Creation and multivariate structure of SDQ. Sleep. 1994;17(2):160–167. 10.1093/sleep/17.2.160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schirnhofer L, Lamprecht B, Vollmer WM, et al. . COPD prevalence in Salzburg, Austria: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) Study. Chest. 2007;131(1):29–36. 10.1378/chest.06-0365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lange P, Celli B, Agusti A, et al. . Lung-function trajectories leading to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(2):111–122. 10.1056/NEJMoa1411532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Salvi S, Barnes PJ. Is exposure to biomass smoke the biggest risk factor for COPD globally? Chest. 2010;138(1):3–6. 10.1378/chest.10-0645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pearce N, Sunyer J, Cheng S, et al. . Comparison of asthma prevalence in the ISAAC and the ECRHS. ISAAC Steering Committee and the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood. Eur Respir J. 2000;16(3):420–426. 10.1183/9031936.00.16337700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bousquet J, Kiley J, Bateman ED, et al. . Prioritised research agenda for prevention and control of chronic respiratory diseases. Eur Respir J. 2010;36(5):995–1001. 10.1183/09031936.00012610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Boezen HM, Vonk JM, van Aalderen WM, et al. . Perinatal predictors of respiratory symptoms and lung function at a young adult age. Eur Respir J. 2002;20(2):383–390. 10.1183/09031936.02.00234102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jobe A. Fetal & Neonatal Lung Development; 2016.
  • 10.Kohansal R, Martinez-Camblor P, Agusti A, Buist AS, Mannino DM, Soriano JB. The natural history of chronic airflow obstruction revisited: an analysis of the Framingham offspring cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(1):3–10. 10.1164/rccm.200901-0047OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lovasi GS, Diez Roux AV, Hoffman EA, Kawut SM, Jacobs DR Jr, Barr RG. Association of environmental tobacco smoke exposure in childhood with early emphysema in adulthood among nonsmokers: the MESA-lung study. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171(1):54–62. 10.1093/aje/kwp358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gehring U, Beelen R, Eeftens M, et al. . Particulate matter composition and respiratory health: the PIAMA Birth Cohort study. Epidemiology. 2015;26(3):300–309. 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Svanes C, Sunyer J, Plana E, et al. . Early life origins of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2010;65(1):14–20. 10.1136/thx.2008.112136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jackson B, Kubzansky LD, Cohen S, Weiss S, Wright RJ. A matter of life and breath: childhood socioeconomic status is related to young adult pulmonary function in the CARDIA study. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33(2):271–278. 10.1093/ije/dyh003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Edwards CA, Osman LM, Godden DJ, Campbell DM, Douglas JG. Relationship between birth weight and adult lung function: controlling for maternal factors. Thorax. 2003;58(12):1061–1065. 10.1136/thorax.58.12.1061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jones M. Effect of preterm birth on airway function and lung growth. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2009;10(Suppl 1):9–11. 10.1016/S1526-0542(09)70005-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tager IB, Hanrahan JP, Tosteson TD, et al. . Lung function, pre- and post-natal smoke exposure, and wheezing in the first year of life. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;147(4):811–817. 10.1164/ajrccm/147.4.811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hedlund U, Eriksson K, Ronmark E. Socio-economic status is related to incidence of asthma and respiratory symptoms in adults. Eur Respir J. 2006;28(2):303–310. 10.1183/09031936.06.00108105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sorlie PD, Kannel WB, O’Connor G. Mortality associated with respiratory function and symptoms in advanced age. The Framingham Study. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;140(2):379–384. 10.1164/ajrccm/140.2.379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sin DD, Man SF. Why are patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at increased risk of cardiovascular diseases? The potential role of systemic inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Circulation. 2003;107(11):1514–1519. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000056767.69054.B3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Horton R, et al. . Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1438–1447. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60393-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Barabási AL, Gulbahce N, Loscalzo J. Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(1):56–68. 10.1038/nrg2918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet. 2009;374(9696):1196–1208. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61460-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.WHO. 2008–2013 Action Plan for the Global Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases.
  • 25.Rabe KF, Hurd S, Anzueto A, et al. . Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176(6):532–555. 10.1164/rccm.200703-456SO [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wouters EF. COPD: from an organ- to a disease-oriented approach. COPD. 2008;5(2):73–74. 10.1080/15412550801940200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Agusti A, Soriano JB. COPD as a systemic disease. COPD. 2008;5(2):133–138. 10.1080/15412550801941349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Eickhoff P, Valipour A, Kiss D, et al. . Determinants of systemic vascular function in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(12):1211–1218. 10.1164/rccm.200709-1412OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Breyer MK, Spruit MA, Celis AP, Rutten EP, Janssen PP, Wouters EF. Highly elevated C-reactive protein levels in obese patients with COPD: a fat chance? Clin Nutr. 2009;28(6):642–647. 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Decramer M, De Benedetto F, Del Ponte A, Marinari S. Systemic effects of COPD. Respir Med 2005;99(Suppl B):S3–S10. 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Su X, Ren Y, Li M, Zhao X, Kong L, Kang J. Prevalence of comorbidities in asthma and nonasthma patients: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(22):e3459. 10.1097/MD.0000000000003459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. . Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(2):319–338. 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, et al. ; Initiative ERSGLF . Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J. 2012;40(6):1324–1343. 10.1183/09031936.00080312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Statisik Austria. https://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/menschen_und_gesellschaft/bevoelkerung/bevoelkerungsstruktur/bevoelkerung_nach_alter_geschlecht/index.html. Assessed 12.4.2017.
  • 35.Statistik Austria. http://www.statistik.at/web_de/frageboegen/private_haushalte/mikrozensus/index.html. Assessed 12.4.2017.
  • 36.Statistik Austria. http://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/menschen_und_gesellschaft/gesundheit/gesundheitsdeterminanten/rauchen/index.html. Assessed 12.4.2017.
  • 37.IBM Corp. Released 2016. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows VA, NY: IBM Corp. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Burgel PR, Paillasseur JL, Caillaud D, et al. ; Initiative BSC . Clinical COPD phenotypes: a novel approach using principal component and cluster analyses. Eur Respir J. 2010;36(3):531–539. 10.1183/09031936.00175109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Diez D, Agusti A, Wheelock CE. Network analysis in the investigation of chronic respiratory diseases. From basics to application. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(9):981–988. 10.1164/rccm.201403-0421PP [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mindell JS, Giampaoli S, Goesswald A, et al. ; Group HESRR . Sample selection, recruitment and participation rates in health examination surveys in Europe—experience from seven national surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:78. 10.1186/s12874-015-0072-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Strandhagen E, Berg C, Lissner L, et al. . Selection bias in a population survey with registry linkage: potential effect on socioeconomic gradient in cardiovascular risk. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(3):163–172. 10.1007/s10654-010-9427-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Antó JM, Vermeire P, Vestbo J, Sunyer J. Epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 2001;17(5):982–994. 10.1183/09031936.01.17509820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Diemer MA, Mistry RS, Wadsworth ME, López I, Reimers F. Best practices in conceptualizing and measuring social class in psychological research. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2013;13(1):77–113. 10.1111/asap.12001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kohansal R, Soriano JB, Agusti A. Investigating the natural history of lung function: facts, pitfalls, and opportunities. Chest. 2009;135(5):1330–1341. 10.1378/chest.08-1750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bakke PS, Ronmark E, Eagan T, et al. ; European Respiratory Society Task Force . Recommendations for epidemiological studies on COPD. Eur Respir J. 2011;38(6):1261–1277. 10.1183/09031936.00193809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Grigg J. Suppression of lung growth by environmental toxins. Thorax. 2016;71(2):99–100. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Martinez FD. Early-life origins of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(9):871–878. 10.1056/NEJMra1603287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kurz C, Orthofer R, Sturm P, et al. . Projection of the air quality in Vienna between 2005 and 2020 for NO2 and PM10. Urban Climate. 2014;10:703–719. 10.1016/j.uclim.2014.03.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.American Academy of Allergy AaIACoA, Asthma and Immunology Allergy diagnostic testing: an updated practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008. Mar;100(3)(Suppl 3):S1–S148. 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60305-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, et al. . Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation. 2005. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000154900.76284.F6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rautaharju PM, Warren JW, Jain U, Wolf HK, Nielsen CL. Cardiac infarction injury score: an electrocardiographic coding scheme for ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 1981;64(2):249–256. 10.1161/01.CIR.64.2.249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, et al. ; European Network for Non-invasive Investigation of Large Arteries . Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(21):2588–2605. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.European Stroke Organisation, Tendera M, Aboyans V, Bartelink ML, et al. ; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines . ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases: document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries: the Task Force on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Artery Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011;32(22):2851–2906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/Default.aspx. Assessed 2010.
  • 55.ISAAC. International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood. http://isaac.auckland.ac.nz/resources/tools.php?menu=tools1#quest. Assessed 2010. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 56.European Community Respiratory Health Survey. http://www.ecrhs.org/quests.htm. Assessed 2010.
  • 57.Stiensmeier-Pelster J, Braune-Krickau M, Schürmann M, Duda K. DIKJ. Depressions-Inventar für Kinder und Jugendliche. 2000.
  • 58.Zigmond A, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–233. 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Fess EE. In: Casanova JS, ed. Clinical assessment recommendations. 2. Chicago: American Society of Hand Therapists; 1992. Grip strength; pp. 41–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, et al. . Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int. 1998;8(5):468–489. 10.1007/s001980050093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111–117. 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Troosters T, Gosselink R, Decramer M. Six minute walking distance in healthy elderly subjects. Eur Respir J. 1999;14(2):270–274. 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14b06.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377–381. 10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mahler DA, Mackowiak JI. Evaluation of the short-form 36-item questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life in patients with COPD. Chest. 1995;107(6):1585–1589. 10.1378/chest.107.6.1585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Japan Epidemiological Association

RESOURCES