Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 4;84(13):8531–8541. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.9b00884

Table 3. Comparison of Experimental and Predicted (Calculated) NMR Chemical Shifts for 1a,b.

      1′S,2′R,3′S,4′S,5′R,1S,3R,6S,7R,10S,11S,14S1
1′S,2′R,3′S,4′S,5′R,1R,3S,6R,7S,10R,11R,14R1
position δC expt δH expt δC calc ΔδC δH calc ΔδH δC calc ΔδC δH calc ΔδH
1 13.9 0.69 15.8 1.9 0.51 –0.18 15.9 2.0 0.44 –0.25
2a 29.8 0.85 28.2 –1.6 0.99 0.14 32.5 2.7 1.16 0.31
2b   2.16     1.97 –0.19     1.84 –0.32
3 72.5   75.8 3.3     75.8 3.3    
4a 33.9 0.77 34.1 0.2 0.90 0.13 31.0 –2.9 0.81 0.04
4b   1.35     1.33 –0.02     1.40 0.05
5a 21.3 1.15 21.7 0.4 1.32 0.17 22.3 1.0 1.25 0.10
5b   1.96     1.90 –0.06     2.06 0.10
6 24.2   26.0 1.8     26.2 2.0    
7 35 1.35 36.8 1.8 1.26 –0.09 35.6 0.6 1.27 –0.08
8a 26.8 0.75 26.5 –0.3 0.82 0.07 27.0 0.2 0.81 0.06
8b   1.16     1.15 –0.01     1.19 0.03
9a 39.2 0.91 38.7 –0.5 0.91 0.00 38.6 –0.6 0.84 –0.07
9b   1.47     1.42 –0.05     1.48 0.01
10 41.6   44.5 2.9     45.3 3.7    
11 36.2   38.5 2.3     37.0 0.8    
12a 25.1 1.27 25.5 0.4 1.21 –0.06 25.4 0.3 1.26 –0.01
12b   1.27     1.34 0.07     1.29 0.02
13a 27.9 1.19 30.2 2.3 1.27 0.08 27.6 –0.3 1.32 0.13
13b   1.73     1.73 0.00     1.58 –0.15
14 61.4 1.19 62.4 1.0 1.00 –0.19 61.4 0.0 1.04 –0.15
15 28.5 1.56 31.9 3.4 1.45 –0.11 31.0 2.5 1.52 –0.04
16 23.3 0.91 19.5 –3.8 0.93 0.02 20.4 –2.9 0.92 0.01
17 23 0.87 21.6 –1.4 0.89 0.02 20.9 –2.1 0.84 –0.03
18 19 0.64 15.4 –3.6 0.70 0.06 15.8 –3.2 0.68 0.04
19 19.1 1.02 17.2 –1.9 0.90 –0.12 17.0 –2.1 0.92 –0.10
20 25.8 1 23.3 –2.5 1.00 0.00 23.7 –2.1 1.05 0.05
1′ 94.7 4.39 94.0 –0.7 4.30 –0.09 92.9 –1.8 4.31 –0.08
2′ 79.3 3.65 78.7 –0.6 3.60 –0.05 78.0 –1.3 3.66 0.01
3′ 76.7 3.44 76.6 –0.1 3.37 –0.07 75.8 –0.9 3.44 0.00
4′ 70.7 3 69.1 –1.6 3.46 0.46 73.4 2.7 3.28 0.28
5′ 76.1 3.13 73.8 –2.3 3.08 –0.05 72.4 –3.7 3.18 0.05
6′a 61.8 3.72 61.2 –0.6 3.67 –0.05 63.8 2.0 3.65 –0.07
6′b   3.37     3.53 0.16     3.46 0.09
rmsec     2.0   0.1   2.1   0.1
DP4+ 1H datad         21.3%       78.7%
DP4+ 13C datad     99.2%       0.8%    
DP4+ all datad   97.2% 2.8%
a

δC expt, δH expt—experimental carbon and proton chemical shifts, δC calc, δH calc—calculated carbon and proton chemical shifts, ΔδC—difference between calculated and experimental carbon chemical shifts, ΔδH—difference between calculated and experimental proton chemical shifts. Bold represents large deviations |ΔδH| > 0.2, |ΔδC| > 3.0.

b

δ values were calculated at the B3LYP/6-311++G(2d,2p) level of theory with PCM model using DMSO as solvent.

c

Root-mean-square error.

d

DP4+ probability.26