Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 3;10:1413. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01413

Table 2.

Mean BDS scores by study, time (pre- vs. post environment exposure), environment condition, and order (test session).

Nature 1st/Urban 2nd Urban 1st/Nature 2nd Other control
Nature (session 1) Urban (session 2) Nature (session 2) Urban (session 1) Other (session 1)
STUDY/Sample Valid N Env factor Statistic Pre Post Pre-post diff Pre Post Pre-post diff Pre Post Pre-post diff Pre Post Mean Diff Pre Post Pre-post diff
1. Walk, UM. Berman et al. (2008) 37 W M 6.85 8.50 1.65 8.05 8.05 0.00 9.06 10.53 1.47 7.65 8.88 1.24
SD 1.95 2.50 2.21 1.76 1.96 1.84 2.08 2.00 1.77 1.87 2.06 2.08
2. Picture study, UM. Berman et al. (2008) 12 W M 9.33 10.33 1.00 9.83 11.00 1.17 6.50 8.33 1.83 5.83 6.67 0.83
SD 3.78 2.66 1.79 3.54 2.00 1.83 2.26 3.14 1.60 2.48 2.50 3.06
3. Walk, healthy sample, UM 2011. 21 W M 7.16 8.89 1.73 9.27 10.27 1.00 9.50 10.25 0.75 7.58 9.33 1.75
SD 3.08 3.28 1.56 2.57 2.33 1.95 2.72 1.65 2.18 2.52 2.47 2.97
4. Walk, MDD sample, UM. Berman et al. (2012) 19 W M 7.11 8.00 0.89 9.00 8.00 −1.00 7.70 9.20 1.50 7.48 7.70 0.23
SD 3.02 2.55 1.45 1.94 1.41 1.00 3.13 3.16 1.43 2.79 2.87 0.67
5. Picture study, UC, 2015. 45 W M 8.57 9.29 0.71 9.43 8.86 −0.57 9.83 9.63 −0.21 8.67 9.17 0.50
SD 1.86 1.35 2.08 1.83 1.90 1.66 2.32 2.67 2.34 2.78 2.62 2.15
6. Picture study, UM, 2015. 37 W M 8.31 9.44 1.13 9.94 9.19 −0.75 8.86 9.19 0.33 8.29 9.19 0.90
SD 2.33 1.93 1.89 2.32 2.54 1.98 2.74 2.66 1.68 2.17 2.27 1.92
7. Walk, UC, 2016. 49 W M 8.96 9.50 0.54 9.58 9.12 −0.46 10.43 10.96 0.52 9.17 9.91 0.74
SD 2.52 2.90 2.14 2.61 2.45 1.58 3.63 3.20 2.87 2.64 3.36 2.32
8. Virtual Reality study, UC, 2016. 82 W M 8.65 9.45 0.80 9.85 10.00 0.15 10.71 11.19 0.48 9.50 10.55 1.05
SD 2.59 2.45 2.19 3.13 2.72 1.82 2.59 2.92 2.04 2.03 2.61 2.38
9. Virtual Reality study- with habituation, UC, 2016. 82 B M 10.40 9.85 −0.55 9.95 10.12 0.17 8.87 9.66 0.79
SD 2.85 2.76 2.10 2.41 2.84 2.09 2.44 2.37 2.26
10. Composite study- Sounds, UC. Van Hedger et al. (2018) 44 B M 9.77 10.64 0.86 8.50 8.77 0.27
SD 2.56 2.52 2.14 3.19 2.88 2.55
11. Composite study- Pictures. UC, 2016 40 B M 9.42 9.95 0.53 8.33 9.19 0.86
SD 2.67 2.20 2.25 2.58 2.64 2.20
12. Video study, UBC. Bourrier et al. (2018) 60 (excl. 30 “other” controls) B M 7.53 8.83 1.30 7.73 7.80 0.07 7.17 7.70 0.53
SD 2.78 2.52 2.05 3.17 3.31 2.85 3.17 2.79 2.39
13. Picture dose study- Session 1 & 2. UM, 2009. 39 (37 in 2nd session) Only nature M 6.15 7.18 1.03 7.68 8.14 0.46
SD 2.12 2.47 1.77 2.19 2.55 1.69
Total, W samples (study 1-8) 302 W M 8.24 9.21 0.97 9.42 9.28 −0.14 9.65 10.26 0.60 8.55 9.45 0.90
SD 2.57 2.45 2.04 2.56 2.42 1.80 2.89 2.84 2.16 2.48 2.76 2.22
N 149 149 153 153
Total, B samples (study 9-12) 226 B M 8.73 9.69 0.96 10.40 9.85 −0.55 9.95 10.12 0.17 8.14 8.49 0.36 8.41 9.13 0.72
SD 2.84 2.53 2.13 2.85 2.76 2.10 2.41 2.84 2.09 3.00 3.02 2.57 2.75 2.63 2.29
N 71 40 42 73 112
Grand Total 567 M 8.06 9.04 0.98 9.62 9.40 −0.23 9.39 9.89 0.50 8.41 9.14 0.72 8.41 9.13 0.72
SD 2.71 2.59 2.02 2.65 2.50 1.87 2.80 2.89 2.08 2.66 2.87 2.35 2.75 2.63 2.29
N 259 189 232 226 112

M, mean; SD, standard deviation. UM, Univ. of Michigan; UC, Univ. of Chicago; UBC, Univ. Of British Columbia; W, environment is a within-subjects factor; B, environment is a between-subjects factor.