Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 10;39(28):5534–5550. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1451-18.2019

Table 4.

Cross-sectional analyses: coefficient estimates for group differences in global measures of integration, segregation, and distinctiveness between young and elderly

Measure Coefficient SE t p Validation resultsa
Global efficiency 9.10e−4 4.38e−4 2.08 0.040* 2,3,4
Local efficiency 3.47e−3 1.06e−3 3.29 1.29e−3* 1,2,3,4
Mean participation coefficient −0.010 1.21e−3 −8.31 1.32e−13* 1,2,3,4
System segregation 9.94e−3 1.28e−3 7.79 2.14e−12* 1,2,3,4

aValidation results: 1, effect remains significant (p < 0.05) after controlling for mean relative motion and number of volumes; 2, effect remains significant (p < 0.05) after repeating the analyses in a subset of participants (young: n = 54; elderly: n = 68) with at least 150 volumes of good-quality imaging data (i.e., ≥5 min in length) remaining after scrubbing; 3, effect remains significant (p < 0.05) after maintaining equal scan lengths (123 volumes) across all participants; 4, effect remains significant (p < 0.05) after controlling for mean functional connectivity strength across all edges.

*Statistically significant effects (p < 0.05).