Table 4.
Cross-sectional analyses: coefficient estimates for group differences in global measures of integration, segregation, and distinctiveness between young and elderly
Measure | Coefficient | SE | t | p | Validation resultsa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global efficiency | 9.10e−4 | 4.38e−4 | 2.08 | 0.040* | 2,3,4 |
Local efficiency | 3.47e−3 | 1.06e−3 | 3.29 | 1.29e−3* | 1,2,3,4 |
Mean participation coefficient | −0.010 | 1.21e−3 | −8.31 | 1.32e−13* | 1,2,3,4 |
System segregation | 9.94e−3 | 1.28e−3 | 7.79 | 2.14e−12* | 1,2,3,4 |
aValidation results: 1, effect remains significant (p < 0.05) after controlling for mean relative motion and number of volumes; 2, effect remains significant (p < 0.05) after repeating the analyses in a subset of participants (young: n = 54; elderly: n = 68) with at least 150 volumes of good-quality imaging data (i.e., ≥5 min in length) remaining after scrubbing; 3, effect remains significant (p < 0.05) after maintaining equal scan lengths (123 volumes) across all participants; 4, effect remains significant (p < 0.05) after controlling for mean functional connectivity strength across all edges.
*Statistically significant effects (p < 0.05).