Skip to main content
. 2019 May 31;8(6):779. doi: 10.3390/jcm8060779

Table 2.

Changes in urinary osmolality, NT-proBNP, and copeptin during dapagliflozin therapy versus placebo in various subgroups.

Baseline Subgroups Mean Baseline Urinary Osmolality (mOsmoL/kg) (SD) Change in Urinary Osmolality (mOsmoL/kg)
(95% CI; p-Value)
Median Baseline NT-proBNP (ng/L)
(IQR)
Change in NT-proBNP (%)
(95% CI; p-Value)
Median Baseline Copeptin (pmoL/L)
(IQR)
Change in Copeptin (%)
(95% CI; p-Value)
Median Baseline Renin (ng/L)
(IQR)
Change in Renin (%)
(95% CI; p-Value)
Diuretics use
Yes (N = 44)
No (N = 25)
554 (168)
573 (196)
63.1 (24.7, 101.5; p < 0.01)
59.1 (8.2, 110.0; p = 0.02)
75 (35, 201)
113 (38, 206)
−3.8% (−22.2, 13.5; p = 0.65)
7.1% (−33.6, 16.4; p = 0.54)
7.3 (5.4, 11.2)
9.0 (5.9, 10.9)
29.6% (18.7, 41.6; p < 0.01)
39.1% (23.9, 56.1; p < 0.01)
38 (19, 85)
29 (17, 72)
52.6% (20.4, 93.4; p < 0.01)
38.7% (1.6, 89.3; p = 0.04)
p for interaction p = 0.19 p = 0.39 p = 0.41 p = 0.08
HbA1c (mmoL/moL)
<63
≥63
532 (175)
589 (177)
71.7 (27.7, 115.8; p < 0.01)
51.4 (9.0, 93.8; p = 0.02)
110 (35, 209)
100 (35, 201)
4.1% (-16.2, 25.8; p=0.68)
−13.0% (−35.0, 5.8; p = 0.18)
7.5 (5.6, 11.2)
9.0 (5.8, 14.0)
32.0% (19.0, 46.5; p < 0.01)
35.3% (19.0, 53.7; p < 0.01)
29 (19, 87)
40 (15, 85)
32.2% (1.07, 73.0; p = 0.04)
62.7% (25.3, 111.2; p < 0.01)
p for interaction p = 0.51 p = 0.76 p = 0.49 p = 0.56
Estimated GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
<82
≥82
509 (152)
611 (188)
65.4 (21.2, 109.5; p < 0.01)
57.1 (14.6, 99.6; p < 0.01)
118 (53, 263)
66 (35, 150)
−4.8% (−26.1, 14.7; p = 0.61)
−4.6% (−26.2, 15.3; p = 0.63)
9.2 (6.3, 16.4)
7.1 (4.5, 10.0)
36.7% (23.6, 51.2; p < 0.01)
29.5% (17.4, 42.8; p < 0.01)
29 (20, 113)
41 (11, 70)
48.5% (13.3, 94.7; p < 0.01)
46.0% (12.2, 90.0; p = 0.01)
p for interaction p = 0.68 p = 0.85 p = b0.46 p = 0.66
UACR (mg/g)
<199.7
≥199.7
591 (199)
532 (151)
76.8 (33.6, 120.0; p < 0.01)
46.6 (3.7, 89.5; p = 0.03)
75 (35, 201)
112 (53, 263)
−10.3% −33.3, 9.5; p = 0.30)
−0.1% (−19.8, 20.0; p = 0.99)
7.7 (5.8, 10.9)
8.9 (5.7, 11.2)
32.5% (19.9, 46.4; p < 0.01)
33.5% (20.8, 47.5; p < 0.01)
38 (17, 67)
37 (19, 85)
45.4% (11.3, 89.8; p < 0.01)
49.0% (14.1, 94.7, p < 0.01)
p for interaction p = 0.92 p = 0.71 p = 0.29 p = 0.41

HbA1c, eGFR, and UACR were split by using the median value (merged database).