Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 24;16(12):2219. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16122219

Table 3.

Basic model with effect of trajectory groups and mediators on ASCVD events using Cox proportional hazard model.

HR (95% CI) in Model 1 HR (95% CI) in Model 2
Trajectory group (1992–2004)
Group 1 (Low steady) 1.0 1.0
Group 2 (Lowering) 1.05 (0.92–1.20) 1.05 (0.92–1.20)
Group 3 (High steady) 1.11 (0.98–1.25) 1.09 (0.97–1.23)
Group 4 (Rise and fall) 1.13 (0.99–1.29) 1.10 (0.96–1.25)
Group 5 (Very high steady) 1.49 (1.33–1.68) 1.46 (1.30–1.64)
Baseline variables (1992–1994)
Age, year 1.04 (1.02–1.06) 1.04 (1.02–1.06)
Body mass index, kg/m2 1.09 (1.07–1.11) 1.07 (1.05–1.08)
Alcohol drinking 1.01 (0.91–1.12) 0.98 (0.88–1.09)
Exercise 0.94 (0.85–1.05) 0.96 (0.86–1.07)
Systolic BP, per 10 mmHg 1.17 (1.13–1.21) 1.10 (1.06–1.14)
Serum glucose, per 10 mg/dL 0.99 (0.96–1.02) 0.98 (0.95–1.01)
Total cholesterol, per 10 mg/dL 1.05 (1.04–1.07) 1.04 (1.02–1.05)
Mediators (2002–2004)
Systolic BP, per 10 mmHg 1.19 (1.15–1.22)
Serum glucose, per 10 mg/dL 1.03 (1.01–1.04)
Total cholesterol, per 10 mg/dL 1.05 (1.02–1.04)
Number of participants 60,709 60,709
Number ASCVD event 2392 2392
AIC 51,847.85 (DF = 11) 51670.78 (DF = 14)
Difference in AIC 177.07 (DF = 3); p < 0.0001

AIC—Akaike information criterion; HR—hazard ratio; CI—confidence interval.