Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 22;8(6):895. doi: 10.3390/jcm8060895

Table 2.

Vitamin 25(OH)D evaluation in enrolled subjects (Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4) using high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet (HPLC-UV), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA), and chemiluminescence immunoassay (Liaison®, Architect I1000®, and Lumipulse®) with respect to the gold standard liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

Groups Sex HPLC-UV
(ng/mL)
LC-MS/MS
(ng/mL)
Liaison
(ng/mL)
EIA
(ng/mL)
Architect
(ng/mL)
Lumipulse
(ng/mL)
Group 1 M 13.7 ± 4.1 15.4 ± 4.3 16.0 ± 5.1 27.3 ± 6.1 16.3 ± 4.0 18.7 ± 5.3
F 14.1 ± 3.5 15.8 ± 3.7 16.3 ± 4.2 26.7 ± 6.2 16.7 ± 3.3 19.5 ± 5.5
Group 2 M 14.9 ± 4.7 16.6 ± 4.7 17.5 ± 5.9 25.8 ± 6.8 17.4 ± 4.4 20.0 ± 5.8
F 15.1 ± 5.7 16.4 ± 6.0 16.0 ± 6.8 28.9 ± 6.2 16.6 ± 5.6 19.3 ± 6.1
Group 3 M 17.3 ± 4.3 18.2 ± 3.2 19.8 ± 3.6 30.2 ± 6.2 19.6 ± 4.1 23.6 ± 5.2
F 18.5 ± 3.8 18.3 ± 3.6 19.9 ± 4.1 30.5 ± 5.9 19.1 ± 3.9 22.1 ± 4.8
Group 4 M 18.9 ± 4.2 19.1 ± 5.2 20.1 ± 4.8 30.7 ± 5.2 20.2 ± 4.5 23.1 ± 4.6
F 20.2 ± 4.5 21.5 ± 4.6 23.6 ± 4.5 29.6 ± 5.1 23.4 ± 3.7 26.9 ± 5.7