Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 8;36(1):35–50.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.05.013

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Transcriptomic CRC Subtypes and CAFs as Drivers of AR to Cetuximab

(A) Transcriptomic subtypes in 13 BL and PD biopsy pairs. TA, transit amplifying; SL, stem-like.

(B) Volcano plot showing differential expression of growth factors in 5 cases from (A) undergoing CMS2>4 switches. Significance was assessed by paired t test.

(C) Changes in TGF-β and EMT transcriptomic signatures through CMS2>4 switches.

(D) Changes in fibroblast abundance through CMS2>4 switches based on MCP-counter analysis.

(E) Impact of CAF conditioned medium (CM) on the growth of DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 50 μg/mL CET for 5 days.

(F) Western blot analysis showing CAF CM rescue of pERK in DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 200 μg/mL CET for 2 h.

(G) mRNA expression (normalized counts) of growth factors (GFs) (left panel) and their receptors (right panel) in CAF, DiFi, and LIM1215 cells.

(H) Growth assay with 200 μg/mL CET and recombinant GF at a concentration of 20 ng/mL (FGF1/2), 10 ng/mL (TGF-β) and 50 ng/mL (HGF) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel).

(I) Western blot analysis of pERK with and without recombinant GF treatment in the presence or absence of 200 μg/mL CET in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel).

(J) Growth assay with CAF CM and combinations of CET, pan-FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi), and MET inhibitor (METi) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel).

(K) Western blot analysis of pERK after 2 h treatment with CAF CM and combinations of CET, FGFRi, and METi in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel).

(E, H, and J) All error bars ± SD of six replicates.

See also Figure S4 and Table S6.