Table 3.

This table describes the relation between the ability of the components of anger and fear (the emotion least well-recognized) to increase the likelihood for recognitions of the emotions which they were most confused with (anger components with fear, and fear components with sad and anger).

Component	Expected emotion	Recognized emotion	Estimate	SE	Wald S.	OR	Lower CL	Upper CL
Strong	Anger	Fear	−1.49	0.17	74.46***	0.23	0.16	0.32
Sudden	Anger	Fear	−1.49	0.17	74.46***	0.23	0.16	0.32
Advance	Anger	Fear	−1.56	0.17	84.72***	0.21	0.15	0.29
Direct	Anger	Fear	−0.69	0.16	17.84***	0.50	0.36	0.69
Retreat	Fear	Sad	−1.13	0.15	54.29***	0.32	0.24	0.44
Condense and enclose	Fear	Sad	1.42	0.20	49.73***	4.14	2.79	6.15
Bind	Fear	Sad	0.14	0.16	0.78	1.15	0.84	1.57
Twist and back	Fear	Sad	−0.67	0.15	18.65***	0.51	0.38	0.69
Retreat	Fear	Anger	0.35	0.23	2.36	1.42	0.91	2.21
Condense and enclose	Fear	Anger	0.39	0.23	2.91	1.48	0.94	2.34
Bind	Fear	Anger	1.32	0.28	21.37***	3.75	2.14	6.57
Twist and back	Fear	Anger	−1.20	0.22	30.04***	0.30	0.19	0.46

Components that predicted an unexpected emotion were colored with the color of that emotion: red for anger, green for fear and blue for sadness. For example: Condense and Enclose which was originally associated with fear (green), was found to increase the likelihood of recognizing sadness (blue). SE, Standard error of the estimate; Wald S., Wald Statistic; OR, Odds Ratio; Lower CI, Lower confidence interval; Upper CL, Upper confidence interval; Significance level was marked:

^*p < 0.05,

^**p < 0.01,

^***p < 0.001.