Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 13;145(4):962–973. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32176

Table 2.

Comparison of BRCA variation types between Chinese and BIC data

BRCA1 BRCA2
Change Chinese Proportion BIC Proportion p Chinese Proportion BIC Proportion p
A. Changes in single base
A > G 36 0.085 155 0.107 0.540 37 0.112 269 0.164 0.084
A > C 10 0.024 39 0.027 0.867 4 0.012 74 0.045 0.003
A > T 28 0.066 54 0.037 0.062 10 0.030 65 0.040 0.438
G > A 46 0.108 204 0.141 0.026 37 0.112 199 0.121 0.644
G > C 12 0.028 57 0.039 0.479 6 0.018 58 0.035 0.126
G > T 39 0.092 117 0.081 0.697 23 0.069 93 0.057 0.700
C > A 11 0.026 57 0.039 0.200 13 0.039 56 0.034 0.627
C > G 19 0.045 67 0.046 0.436 21 0.063 93 0.057 0.700
C > T 61 0.144 167 0.115 0.042 44 0.133 192 0.117 0.461
T > A 11 0.026 43 0.030 0.752 6 0.018 52 0.032 0.214
T > G 13 0.031 59 0.041 0.262 11 0.033 85 0.052 0.093
T > C 23 0.054 93 0.064 1.000 11 0.033 108 0.066 0.061
insA 13 0.031 57 0.039 0.479 7 0.021 55 0.034 0.301
insG 4 0.009 19 0.013 0.815 1 0.003 15 0.009 0.499
insC 3 0.007 11 0.008 0.745 1 0.003 5 0.003 0.339
insT 2 0.005 24 0.017 0.271 5 0.015 37 0.023 0.135
delA 25 0.059 86 0.059 0.910 38 0.115 67 0.041 0.000
delG 24 0.056 49 0.034 0.052 22 0.066 26 0.016 0.000
delC 16 0.038 41 0.028 0.529 17 0.051 40 0.024 0.004
delT 29 0.068 50 0.035 0.003 17 0.051 52 0.032 0.101
Sub‐total 425 1,449 331 1,641
B. Changes of variant types1
Frameshift 214 0.420 555 0.318 0.056 286 0.571 586 0.295 0.000
Missense 130 0.255 609 0.349 0.000 76 0.152 889 0.447 0.000
Nonsense 10 0.020 201 0.115 0.000 2 0.004 187 0.094 0.000
Stop gain 88 0.173 0.000 0.000 98 0.196 0.000 0.000
Splice 31 0.061 5 0.003 0.000 13 0.026 3 0.002 0.000
Intron 6 0.012 292 0.167 0.000 0.000 196 0.099 0.000
Inframe deletion 6 0.012 26 0.015 0.540 3 0.006 27 0.014 0.177
Inframe insertion 0.000 1 0.001 1.000 0.000 4 0.002 0.584
Synonymous 25 0.049 51 0.029 0.142 23 0.046 82 0.041 0.717
Sub‐total 510 1,746 501 1,987
1

To comprimise naming differences between Chinese data and BIC data for comparison, the names in Chinese data were converted as: Frameshift deletion and frameshift insertion were combined as frameshift; Nonsynonymous SNV and missense were combined as Missense, Nonframeshift deletion was converted as In Frame Deletion, Splice site to Splice. Statistical comparison was performed using Fisher's exact test.