Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 11;8(6):380–395. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12426

Table 1.

Comparison of R‐based quantitative systems pharmacology modeling workflow features

Functionality IQRtools mrgsolve RxODE
Standardized data set Yes—flexible data set suitable for heterogeneous data Yes—flexible data set suitable for heterogeneous data No—no predefined data set structure
Data exploration Yes—designated functions available Yes—designated functions available No—requires manual implementation
Translation to NLME software Yes—IQR modeling project can be translated to Monolix, NONMEM, and NLMIXR; projects can be executed and results are postprocessed No Yes—works with NLMIXR
Integrated parameter estimation tool Yes—fully integrated likelihood‐based parameter estimation tool No—requires additional R packages (e.g., minqa, RcppDE, GenSA, etc.) and manual implementation of objective function No—requires additional R packages (e.g., minqa, RcppDE, GenSA, etc.) and manual implementation of objective function
Model diagnostics Yes—automatic simulations vs. the data and goodness of fit plots Yes—available through model simulations based on data set‐derived event tables No—requires manual simulations vs. experimental data
Model simulations Yes Yes Yes—the fastest simulation tool
Local sensitivity analysis Yes—requires additional programming Yes—fully automated through designated functions Yes—requires additional programming
Identifiability analysis Yes—calculation of FIM and evaluation of profile likelihood No No
User interface Yes—available as an add‐on No No

NLME, nonlinear mixed‐effects.