Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 3;48(5):715–725. doi: 10.1111/vsu.13242

Table 1.

Data retrieved from the veterinary literature on LOHE

Authors Aim of study Ports, n Dogs, n BW, mean, kg BW, SD, kg BW, median, kg BW range from, kg BW range to, kg Age, mean, mo Age, SD, y Age, median, mo Age range from, mo Age range to, mo
Bydzovsky et ala LOHE 1 42 19.17 7.77 19 5. 39.5 23.95 16.07 17 7 81
Austin et al7 LOHE 3 9 17.7 10 26 5 60
Bakthiari et al8 Conventional LOHE vs transvaginal LOHE 3 24 (12 in each group) 14 17
Brun et al10 Hybrid NOTES technique with a transvaginal access and 1 port 1 + 1 transvaginal port 1
Davidson et al11 LOE vs. LOHE 4 16 17.9 10 38 10.5 4 36
Devitt et al2 Comparison of duration, complications, stress, pain of open OHE vs LOHE 2 10 22.1 5 17.4 9.36
Dutta et al13 LOE vs 2 techniques of LOHE (endoclip & electrocautery vs electrocautery) 3 40 (20 in each group) 17.2 0.62 15 20 20.68 1.28 16 28
Hancock et al3 Comparison of postoperative pain after median celiotomy with LOHE 3 8 11 10.1 12.2
Kim et al15 Evaluation of postoperative pain behavior and biochemical stress response in dogs undergoing LOHE 3 16 19.55 3.65 18.6 1.8
Mayhew and Brown17 Comparison of 3 techniques of ovarian pedicle hemostasis during LOHE (sutures vs clips vs vessel sealing) 3 30 (10 in each group) 20 8.9 35.5 12 48
Pukacz et al20 LOHE 2 59 21.1 3 45 30 6 138
Sanchez‐Margallo et al5 LOHE with SILS port 1 9 11.28 4.63 7.5 23 4.55 2.24 12 84
Silva et al23 Total‐NOTES vs single‐port laparoscopic assisted vs conventional OHE 1 and 1 transvaginal port 40, 12 NOTES, 13 single‐port, 15 conventional 12.6 6. 8.9 25
Wenkel et al28 LOHE 3 27 6 48 9 54
Zhang et al29 Comparison of IL‐6 and C‐reactive protein in dogs undergoing a gasless LOHE vs conventional LOHE 3 conventional vs 4 gasless 10 10 23 12 24

Abbreviations: …, no data; BW, body weight; IL, interleukin; LOE, laparoscopic ovariectomy; LOHE, laparoscopic‐assisted ovariohysterectomy; NOTES, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

a

Current study.