Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 29;125(14):2445–2454. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32084

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics for Patients Enrolled in Part 2 (Intent‐To‐Treat Population)

Ontuxizumab at 8 mg/kg + G/D (n = 139) Placebo + G/D (n = 70) Total (n = 209)
Age, mean (SD), y 55 (13) 54 (14) 55 (14)
Sex, No. (%)
Male 76 (55) 38 (54) 114 (55)
Female 63 (45) 32 (46) 95 (46)
Race, No. (%)
White 116 (83) 57 (81) 173 (83)
Black or African American 12 (9) 9 (13) 21 (10)
Other 11 (8) 4 (6) 15 (7)
Initial histologic diagnosis grade, No. (%)
1 3 (2) 4 (6) 7 (3)
2 21 (15) 13 (19) 34 (16)
3 82 (59) 38 (54) 120 (57)
Unknown 22 (16) 9 (13) 31 (15)
Missing 11 (8) 6 (9) 17 (8)
Baseline ECOG performance status, No. (%)
0 67 (48) 39 (56) 106 (51)
1 72 (52) 31 (44) 103 (49)
Prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting 74 (53) 40 (57) 114 (55)
First line 65 (47) 30 (43) 95 (45)
Second line 53 (38) 29 (41) 82 (39)
Third line 21 (15) 11 (16) 32 (15)
Histologic subtype, No. (%)
Liposarcoma 30 (22) 15 (21) 45 (22)
Leiomyosarcoma 41 (29) 21 (30) 62 (30)
Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma or myxofibrosarcoma 30 (22) 15 (21) 45 (22)
Other 38 (27) 19 (27) 57 (27)
Angiosarcoma 3 2 5
Spindle cell sarcoma 3 2 5
Peripheral nerve sheath tumor 6 1 7
Synovial sarcoma 14 6 20
Miscellaneous or unclassifieda 12 8 20

Abbreviations: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; G/D, gemcitabine and docetaxel; SD, standard deviation.

a

The miscellaneous and unclassified histologic subtypes included patients with histologic diagnoses of rhabdomyosarcoma (3), unclassified sarcoma (3), epithelioid sarcoma (3), hemangiopericytoma (2), endometrial sarcoma (2), adenosarcoma (1), clear cell sarcoma (1), fibrosarcoma (1), intimal sarcoma (1), phyllodes (1), other liposarcoma (1), and small blue round cell tumor (1).