Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 29;125(14):2445–2454. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32084

Table 2.

PFS With the Bayesian Hierarchical Model in Part 2

Sarcoma Type Ontuxizumab at 8.0 mg/kg + G/D Placebo + G/D
Liposarcoma
No. 30 15
PFS observed, median, wk 14.6 24.1
Hazard ratio (95% CI) 1.12 (0.69‐1.89)
OS observed, median, wk 58.5 54.4
Hazard ratio (95% CI) 1.1 (0.56‐1.87)
BOR (% with response) 20/30 (67) 12/15 (80)
P .236
Leiomyosarcoma
No. 41 21
PFS observed, median, wk 18.3 24.0
Hazard ratio (95% CI) 1.08 (0.68‐1.61)
OS observed, median, wk 64.6 69.1
Hazard ratio (95% CI) 1.3 (0.74‐2.28)
BOR (% with response) 27/41 (66) 16/21 (76)
P .551
UPS
No. 30 15
PFS observed, median, wk 10.3 33.6
Hazard ratio (95% CI) 1.23 (0.73‐2.09)
OS observed, median, wk 54.1 55.3
Hazard ratio (95% CI) 1.2 (0.68‐2.00)
BOR (% with response) 16/30 (53) 11/15 (73)
P .174
Other
No. 38 19
PFS observed, median, wk 10.3 6.7
Hazard ratio (95% CI) 1.01 (0.60‐1.54)
OS observed, median, wk 56.6 57.1
Hazard ratio (95% CI) 1.1 (0.63‐1.70)
BOR (% with response) 24/38 (63) 8/19 (42)
P .389

Abbreviations: BOR, best overall response (stable disease, partial response, or complete response); CI, confidence interval; G/D, gemcitabine and docetaxel; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression‐free survival; UPS, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma.