Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 28;61(4):973–982. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201800107

Table 1.

Definitions of effect size measures and pathways between them as well as transformation formulas are given and effect sizes derived from Cohen´s benchmark values: SMD = 0.2 (small), 0.5 (medium‐sized), and 0.8 (large) for relevance of a difference

Effect size measures with relationships
Robust/assumption free
Magnitude MW MWD MWodds RDaverage
Small 0.444 –0.113 0.798 –0.056
Medium 0.362 –0.276 0.567 –0.138
Large 0.286 –0.428 0.400 –0.214
Measures with distribution assumption
Normal distribution Proportional odds Lehmann alternative
Cohen's δ Odds ratio β Hazard rate ratio γ
Parameters
δ=Φ1( MW )2
β = Numerical solution of MW=β*(β1lnβ)β12
γ= MW 1 MW
0.200 0.713 0.798
0.500 0.428 0.567
0.800 0.256 0.400
Odds ratio extreme
Φ(δ/2)Φ(+δ/2)2
Constant = β From γ→0
0.727 0.713 0.798
0.450 0.428 0.567
0.277 0.256 0.400
Risk difference extreme
Φδ2Φ+δ2
β1β+1
γ(1γ)1211γ
–0.080 –0.085 –0.083
–0.197 –0.209 –0.206
–0.311 –0.329 –0.326

Remark: the direction of the effect size measures could also be reversed: SMD could be minus instead of plus; MW, reflected around 0.5; OR, larger than 1 or reciprocal. The direction of superiority, however, must be defined.