Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 21;33(34):13834–13847. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1443-13.2013

Table 1.

Comparison of R2 values for linear and logarithmic functions (Experiment 1)a

Interval duration 3018 ms 3310 ms 3629 ms 3979 ms 4363 ms 4784 ms
R2 of linear function 0.099 ± 0.004 0.105 ± 0.004 0.114 ± 0.004 0.117 ± 0.004 0.116 ± 0.005 0.118 ± 0.005
R2 of log function 0.102 ± 0.004 0.108 ± 0.004 0.117 ± 0.004 0.120 ± 0.005 0.119 ± 0.005 0.120 ± 0.005
p value (t test) <10−7 <10−5 <10−5 <0.001 <10−4 <0.001

aR2 values of all analyzed neurons (n = 733) were compared for the regression models containing linear versus log-transformed time (Eq. 1) for each sample interval duration (mean ± SEM). R2 values were significantly larger for the model containing log-transformed time for all interval durations (paired t test).