Table 1.
Dataset | Direction selectivity | Cells (n) |
p value for Kruskal–Wallis test |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bandwidth |
Direction index |
|||||
Quadrant | Axis | Quadrant | Axis | |||
Stat-ref | Low (<0.33) | 1120 | 0.021 | 0.033 | 0.14 | 0.12 |
Stat-ref | High (≥0.33) | 1703 | 1.4 · 10−5 | 4.8 · 10−5 | <10−6 | <10−6 |
Grey-ref | Low (<0.33) | 1804 | 0.057 | 0.81 | 0.00022 | 0.093 |
Grey-ref | High (≥0.33) | 670 | 3 · 10−6 | <10−6 | 0.015 | 0.027 |
Analysis of the Stat-ref and Grey-ref datasets, split into subgroups exhibiting high (>0.33) and low (<0.33) direction selectivity of the orientation tuning curves. Columns 4–7 show p values from the respective Kruskal–Wallis tests on differences in bandwidth and direction index of the tuning curves between quadrant and orientation axis subgroups. Column 3 shows the total number of neurons included in each comparison. Each control dataset was tested identically to the original dataset.