Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 27;33(48):19012–19022. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1797-13.2013

Table 3.

Vertical eye movements

Group Condition Entire delay (0–5.0 s) Start of delay (0–1.5 s) Mid delay (1.5–3.5 s) End of delay (3.5–5 s)
Low performers 1-item 30.2 ± 9.7 15.6 ± 5.2 7.8 ± 1.9 6.8 ± 4.0
Low performers 5-item 38.6 ± 10.6 20.4 ± 5.6 10.4 ± 4.5 7.8 ± 3.3
Low performers 5-item (D) 40.8 ± 13.1 21.6 ± 6.3 10.6 ± 3.8 8.6 ± 4.0
High performers 1-item 26.6 ± 9.1 14.8 ± 6.8 7.4 ± 3.0 4.4 ± 2.4
High performers 5-item 35.2 ± 5.4 20.6 ± 3.2 10.4 ± 2.9 6.0 ± 1.9
High performers 5-item (D) 41.4 ± 9.2 20.4 ± 4.5 12.6 ± 4.9 8.4 ± 2.8

The mean number of vertical eye movements (blinks) identified with independent component analysis during MEG recordings of DMS memory delays in NC1 (Study 1). There were no statistical differences in identified eye movements between memory load (1-item or 5-item) or distractor present (D) conditions and also, no differences between high or low memory performance groups (all p > 0.11); confirming that statistical comparisons of bifrontal theta coupling in NC1 were not notably influenced by eye movements during the MEG recordings.