Table 3.
Vertical eye movements
Group | Condition | Entire delay (0–5.0 s) | Start of delay (0–1.5 s) | Mid delay (1.5–3.5 s) | End of delay (3.5–5 s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low performers | 1-item | 30.2 ± 9.7 | 15.6 ± 5.2 | 7.8 ± 1.9 | 6.8 ± 4.0 |
Low performers | 5-item | 38.6 ± 10.6 | 20.4 ± 5.6 | 10.4 ± 4.5 | 7.8 ± 3.3 |
Low performers | 5-item (D) | 40.8 ± 13.1 | 21.6 ± 6.3 | 10.6 ± 3.8 | 8.6 ± 4.0 |
High performers | 1-item | 26.6 ± 9.1 | 14.8 ± 6.8 | 7.4 ± 3.0 | 4.4 ± 2.4 |
High performers | 5-item | 35.2 ± 5.4 | 20.6 ± 3.2 | 10.4 ± 2.9 | 6.0 ± 1.9 |
High performers | 5-item (D) | 41.4 ± 9.2 | 20.4 ± 4.5 | 12.6 ± 4.9 | 8.4 ± 2.8 |
The mean number of vertical eye movements (blinks) identified with independent component analysis during MEG recordings of DMS memory delays in NC1 (Study 1). There were no statistical differences in identified eye movements between memory load (1-item or 5-item) or distractor present (D) conditions and also, no differences between high or low memory performance groups (all p > 0.11); confirming that statistical comparisons of bifrontal theta coupling in NC1 were not notably influenced by eye movements during the MEG recordings.