Table 1.
Comparison of AP-5 and RO effect on CA3 oscillations
AP-5 (50 μm) |
RO 25-6981 (5 μm) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Septal | Temporal | Septal | Temporal | |||
Waveform amplitude (mV) | 0.11 ± 0.02 to 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.22 ± 0.02 to 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.03 to 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.07 to 0.21 ± 0.07 | ||
NS | NS | |||||
NS | NS | NS | NS | |||
Waveform rising time (ms) | 114.7 ± 6.6 to 124.5 ± 11.8 | 136.1 ± 9.5 to 119.9 ± 8.4 | 136.7 ± 14.7 to 126.0 ± 15.1 | 116.7 ± 11.6 to 98.3 ± 8.5 | ||
NS | NS | |||||
NS | NS | NS | NS | |||
Waveform decay time (ms) | 96.5 ± 4.7 to 58.0 ± 3.1 | 154.8 ± 7.1 to 60.5 ± 4.7 | 84.0 ± 6.7 to 65.7 ± 5.7 | 145.2 ± 20.0 to 49.7 ± 4.3 | ||
*** | ** | |||||
↓↓↓ (38.0 ± 3.7%) | ↓↓↓ (60.3 ± 2.7%) | ↓ (20.4 ± 6.7%) | ↓↓ (61.4 ± 6.2%) | |||
Oscillation frequency (Hz) | 1.96 ± 0.09 to 2.32 ± 0.16 | 1.91 ± 0.08 to 2.84 ± 0.14 | 2.22 ± 0.14 to 2.42 ± 0.27 | 1.88 ± 0.18 to 2.90 ± 0.17 | ||
*** | * | |||||
↑↑ (17.9 ± 7.3%) | ↑↑↑ (48.7 ± 4.1%) | NS | ↑ (61.1 ± 21.8%) | |||
Oscillation power (kμV2) | 11.5 ± 2.1 to 6.4 ± 1.2 | 52.3 ± 8.8 to 41.6 ± 8.1 | ||||
NS | * | |||||
↓↓ (38.8 ± 8.7%) | ↓ (22.7 ± 9.6%) | NS | ↓↓ (66.5 ± 17.1%) | |||
37.3 ± 2.8 to 27.2 ± 1.9 | 52.7 ± 2.3 to 37.3 ± 2.0 | 40.1 ± 7.2 to 33.5 ± 7.0 | 38.9 ± 3.6 to 27.8 ± 5.3 | |||
NS | * | |||||
Oscillation strength | ↓↓↓ (23.2 ± 6.5%) | ↓↓↓ (28.3 ± 3.6%) | NS | ↓ (28.9 ± 10.9%) |
↑ indicates Significant increase; ↓, significant decrease. 1 arrow, p < 0.05; 2 arrows, p < 0.01; 3 arrows, p < 0.001. NS, not significant (p > 0.05, paired t test). AP-5, n = 17; RO, n = 6.
Significant differential effect septal versus temporal test:
*p < 0.05;
**p < 0.01;
***p < 0.001; NS, p > 0.05.