Skip to main content
. 2013 May 8;33(19):8276–8287. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0179-13.2013

Table 1.

Comparison of AP-5 and RO effect on CA3 oscillations

AP-5 (50 μm)
RO 25-6981 (5 μm)
Septal Temporal Septal Temporal
Waveform amplitude (mV) 0.11 ± 0.02 to 0.10 ± 0.02 0.22 ± 0.02 to 0.23 ± 0.03 0.12 ± 0.03 to 0.11 ± 0.03 0.31 ± 0.07 to 0.21 ± 0.07
NS NS
NS NS NS NS
Waveform rising time (ms) 114.7 ± 6.6 to 124.5 ± 11.8 136.1 ± 9.5 to 119.9 ± 8.4 136.7 ± 14.7 to 126.0 ± 15.1 116.7 ± 11.6 to 98.3 ± 8.5
NS NS
NS NS NS NS
Waveform decay time (ms) 96.5 ± 4.7 to 58.0 ± 3.1 154.8 ± 7.1 to 60.5 ± 4.7 84.0 ± 6.7 to 65.7 ± 5.7 145.2 ± 20.0 to 49.7 ± 4.3
*** **
↓↓↓ (38.0 ± 3.7%) ↓↓↓ (60.3 ± 2.7%) ↓ (20.4 ± 6.7%) ↓↓ (61.4 ± 6.2%)
Oscillation frequency (Hz) 1.96 ± 0.09 to 2.32 ± 0.16 1.91 ± 0.08 to 2.84 ± 0.14 2.22 ± 0.14 to 2.42 ± 0.27 1.88 ± 0.18 to 2.90 ± 0.17
*** *
↑↑ (17.9 ± 7.3%) ↑↑↑ (48.7 ± 4.1%) NS ↑ (61.1 ± 21.8%)
Oscillation power (kμV2) 11.5 ± 2.1 to 6.4 ± 1.2 52.3 ± 8.8 to 41.6 ± 8.1
NS *
↓↓ (38.8 ± 8.7%) ↓ (22.7 ± 9.6%) NS ↓↓ (66.5 ± 17.1%)
37.3 ± 2.8 to 27.2 ± 1.9 52.7 ± 2.3 to 37.3 ± 2.0 40.1 ± 7.2 to 33.5 ± 7.0 38.9 ± 3.6 to 27.8 ± 5.3
NS *
Oscillation strength ↓↓↓ (23.2 ± 6.5%) ↓↓↓ (28.3 ± 3.6%) NS ↓ (28.9 ± 10.9%)

↑ indicates Significant increase; ↓, significant decrease. 1 arrow, p < 0.05; 2 arrows, p < 0.01; 3 arrows, p < 0.001. NS, not significant (p > 0.05, paired t test). AP-5, n = 17; RO, n = 6.

Significant differential effect septal versus temporal test:

*p < 0.05;

**p < 0.01;

***p < 0.001; NS, p > 0.05.