Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 10;14(7):e0219500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219500

Table 2. Mean utility scores and QALYs per child by treatment arm.

n Intervention arm, mean (95% CI) Control arm, mean (95% CI)
Utility score
Baseline 1350 0.836 (0.826 to 0.846) 0.816 (0.805 to 0.827)
FU 1 1215 0.868 (0.868 to 0.877) 0.858 (0.850 to 0.866)
FU 2 1128 0.893 (0.884 to 0.901) 0.898 (0.891 to 0.905)
QALY Differences Mean Difference
(95% CI)
p-value
Unadjusted
FU1 0.018 (0.005 to 0.031) 0.006
FU2 0.019 (-0.003 to 0.041) 0.097
Adjusted *
FU 1 0.005 (-0.008 to 0.018) 0.429
FU 2 0.006 (-0.024 to 0.036) 0.701

*adjusted for baseline cluster-level covariates (school size, proportion of children eligible for free school meals, ethnicity) and baseline child-level covariates (gender, baseline CHU9D score, ethnicity, deprivation, baseline total energy consumption and baseline physical activity energy expenditure).