Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Haematol. 2019 May 17;6(7):e366–e374. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30085-7

Table 3:

Overall survival by risk group in the training and validation datasets.

Score n (%) Comparison Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 24 Month OS (95% CI) C-statistic (95% CI) log-rank p-value
Ibrutinib/CIT Training Dataset1 n=727 0·74 (0·60–0·85) <0001
 Low 0–1 278(38·2%) 89·7% (85·4–92·7)
 Intermediate 2–3 321 (44·2%) vs Low 2·38 (1·65–3·45) 79·5% (74·5–83·6)
 High 4 82 (11·3%) vs Intermediate 2·22 (1·56–3·16) 55·8% (44·1–65·9)
vs Low 5·29 (3·44–8·15)
 Missing 46 (6·3%)
Ibrutinib/CIT Internal-Validation2 n=242 0·79 (0·56–0·97) <0001
 Low 0–1 96 (39·7%) 92·0% (83·9–96·1)
 Intermediate 2–3 119 (49·1%) vs Low 2·78 (1·45–5·33) 76·4% (67·5–83·2)
 High 4 27 (11·2%) vs Intermediate 1·83 (1·00–3·33) 66·7% (45·7–81·1)
vs Low 508 (2·38–10·85)
Idelalisib/CIT External-Validation1 n=897 0·71 (0·59–0·81) <0001
 Low 0–1 278 (31·0%) 82·6% (77·1–86·9)
 Intermediate 2–3 460 (51·3%) vs Low 2·71 (1·96–3·73) 61·8% (56·9–66·4)
 High 4 147 (16·4%) vs Intermediate 1·44 (1·10–1·89) 49·5% (40·7–57·8)
vs Low 3·90 (2·71–5·62)
 Missing 12 (1·3%)
Venetoclax/CIT External-Validation1 n=389 0·76 (0·66–0·85) 001
 Low 0–1 170 (43·7%) 951% (90·5–97·5)
 Intermediate 2–3 180 (46·3%) vs Low 201 (1·14–3·56) 84·6% (78·1–89·2)
 High 4 30 (7·7%) vs Intermediate 1·40 (0·65–3·02) 82·2% (62·5–92·2)
vs Low 2·82 (1·23–6·50)
 Missing 9 (2·3%)
MCCD External-Validation1 n=220 0·61 (0·56–0·66) <0001
 Low 0–1 62 (28·2%) 87·5% (79·2–96·6)
 Intermediate 2–3 149 (67·6%) vs Low 2·95 (1·80–4·84) 63·5% (56·0–72·1)
 High 4 9 (4·1%) vs Intermediate 2·02 (0·93–4·40) 44·4% (21·4–92.3)
vs Low 5·96 (2·46–14·41)

OS, overall survival; CI, confidence interval; CIT, chemoimmunotherapy; MCCD, Mayo Clinic CLL Database;

1

Based on complete case analysis.

2

Based on multiple imputation analysis (imputed dataset whose C-statistic is the median of the 5 imputations is shown).