Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 23;28(8):2247–2254. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02148-2

Table 2.

Neuro-QOL Fatigue individual item responses and results from a repeated-measures proportional odds model at REGAIN week 26

Parameter Treatment Observed responses for Neuro-QOL Fatigue items at REGAIN week 26 Repeated-measures model estimate for REGAIN week 26
1 = Never, n (%) 2 = Rarely, n (%) 3 = Sometimes, n (%) 4 = Often, n (%) 5 = Always, n (%) Proportional odds ratio (95% CI)b p value for odds ratiob,c p value for proportional odds assumptiond
I felt exhausted ECU (na = 57) 9 (15.8) 14 (24.6) 19 (33.3) 13 (22.8) 2 (3.5) 2.4 (1.3, 4.4) 0.0038 0.1099
PLC (na = 60) 5 (8.3) 9 (15.0) 25 (41.7) 16 (26.7) 5 (8.3)
I felt that I had no energy ECU (na = 57) 9 (15.8) 15 (26.3) 21 (36.8) 9 (15.8) 3 (5.3) 1.9 (1.1, 3.5) 0.0322 0.5692
PLC (na = 60) 5 (8.3) 10 (16.7) 23 (38.3) 15 (25.0) 7 (11.7)
I felt fatigued ECU (na = 57) 7 (12.3) 16 (28.1) 22 (38.6) 8 (14.0) 4 (7.0) 1.8 (1.0, 3.4) 0.0467 0.3357
PLC (na = 60) 2 (3.3) 14 (23.3) 24 (40.0) 15 (25.0) 5 (8.3)
I was too tired to do my household chores ECU (na = 56) 16 (28.6) 15 (26.8) 13 (23.2) 7 (12.5) 5 (8.9) 1.9 (1.0, 3.4) 0.0437 0.6454
PLC (na = 60) 11 (18.3) 11 (18.3) 19 (31.7) 17 (28.3) 2 (3.3)
I was too tired to leave the house ECU (na = 57) 22 (38.6) 12 (21.1) 12 (21.1) 8 (14.0) 3 (5.3) 2.5 (1.4, 4.7) 0.0033 0.2162
PLC (na = 60) 12 (20.0) 11 (18.3) 20 (33.3) 15 (25.0) 2 (3.3)
I was frustrated by being too tired to do the things I wanted to do ECU (na = 57) 20 (35.1) 14 (24.6) 11 (19.3) 8 (14.0) 4 (7.0) 2.5 (1.4, 4.5) 0.0032 0.4059
PLC (na = 60) 14 (23.3) 7 (11.7) 16 (26.7) 18 (30.0) 5 (8.3)
I felt tired ECU (na = 57) 9 (15.8) 9 (15.8) 22 (38.6) 12 (21.1) 5 (8.8) 2.3 (1.2, 4.4) 0.0092 0.3737
PLC (na = 60) 0 (0.0) 9 (15.0) 26 (43.3) 17 (28.3) 8 (13.3)
I had to limit my social activity because I was tired ECU (na = 57) 15 (26.3) 16 (28.1) 13 (22.8) 9 (15.8) 4 (7.0) 2.6 (1.4, 4.7) 0.0026 0.6225
PLC (na = 60) 8 (13.3) 11 (18.3) 18 (30.0) 17 (28.3) 6 (10.0)
I needed help doing my usual activities because of my fatigue ECU (na = 57) 26 (45.6) 10 (17.5) 10 (17.5) 7 (12.3) 4 (7.0) 2.3 (1.2, 4.2) 0.0104 0.5279
PLC (na = 60) 14 (23.3) 11 (18.3) 20 (33.3) 12 (20.0) 3 (5.0)
I needed to sleep during the day ECU (na = 57) 14 (24.6) 14 (24.6) 13 (22.8) 10 (17.5) 6 (10.5) 1.5 (0.8, 2.7) 0.2164 0.4892
PLC (na = 60) 12 (20.0) 7 (11.7) 16 (26.7) 15 (25.0) 10 (16.7)
I had trouble starting things because I was too tired ECU (na = 57) 16 (28.1) 18 (31.6) 13 (22.8) 6 (10.5) 4 (7.0) 2.2 (1.2, 4.1) 0.0096 0.1930
PLC (na = 60) 15 (25.0) 7 (11.7) 18 (30.0) 13 (21.7) 7 (11.7)
I had trouble finishing things because I was too tired ECU (na = 57) 20 (35.1) 13 (22.8) 13 (22.8) 8 (14.0) 3 (5.3) 2.5 (1.4, 4.5) 0.0027 0.8333
PLC (na = 60) 12 (20.0) 11 (18.3) 18 (30.0) 13 (21.7) 6 (10.0)
I was too tired to take a short walk ECU (na = 57) 19 (33.3) 14 (24.6) 11 (19.3) 9 (15.8) 4 (7.0) 1.5 (0.8, 2.7) 0.1896 0.9608
PLC (na = 60) 17 (28.3) 10 (16.7) 15 (25.0) 14 (23.3) 4 (6.7)
I was too tired to eat ECU (na = 57) 30 (52.6) 12 (21.1) 10 (17.5) 1 (1.8) 4 (7.0) 1.2 (0.6, 2.3) 0.5365 0.9093
PLC (na = 60) 25 (41.7) 17 (28.3) 11 (18.3) 7 (11.7) 0 (0.0)
I was so tired that I had to rest during the day ECU (na = 57) 10 (17.5) 11 (19.3) 13 (22.8) 17 (29.8) 6 (10.5) 1.2 (0.7, 2.3) 0.4697 0.4873
PLC (na = 60) 9 (15.0) 8 (13.3) 19 (31.7) 14 (23.3) 10 (16.7)
I felt weak all over ECU (na = 57) 23 (40.4) 9 (15.8) 13 (22.8) 7 (12.3) 5 (8.8) 2.5 (1.4, 4.7) 0.0032 0.4309
PLC (na = 60) 12 (20.0) 12 (20.0) 14 (23.3) 17 (28.3) 5 (8.3)
I needed help doing my usual activities because of weakness ECU (na = 57) 26 (45.6) 12 (21.1) 10 (17.5) 6 (10.5) 3 (5.3) 2.3 (1.2, 4.2) 0.0095 0.3340
PLC (na = 60) 14 (23.3) 13 (21.7) 17 (28.3) 14 (23.3) 2 (3.3)
I had to limit my social activity because I was physically weak ECU (na = 57) 19 (33.3) 18 (31.6) 6 (10.5) 10 (17.5) 4 (7.0) 2.9 (1.6, 5.3) 0.0006 0.1119
PLC (na = 60) 10 (16.7) 8 (13.3) 20 (33.3) 15 (25.0) 7 (11.7)
I had to force myself to get up and do things because I was physically too weak ECU (na = 57) 25 (43.9) 15 (26.3) 9 (15.8) 5 (8.8) 3 (5.3) 2.1 (1.1, 4.0) 0.0172 0.0927
PLC (na = 60) 19 (31.7) 7 (11.7) 18 (30.0) 15 (25.0) 1 (1.7)

The p values associated with the proportional odds assumption indicated that this assumption was upheld for each item

CI confidence interval, ECU eculizumab, Neuro-QOL Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders, PLC placebo

aNumber of patients who completed the assessment at week 26; missing scores were not imputed for patients who did not complete the assessment (ECU, n = 5 [n = 6 for ‘I was too tired to do my household chores’]; PLC, n = 3)

bProportional odds ratios and p values are based on a repeated-measures ordinal regression (implemented using the GEEORD SAS Macro). The model has the ordinal response (for each parameter) at each visit as the dependent variable with terms for treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, assuming exchangeable correlation structure. A higher odds ratio indicates that eculizumab-treated patients are more likely to answer in the lower response categories than those receiving placebo at week 26 for that item

cp values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons

dA value for proportional odds assumption < 0.05 may indicate non-proportionality