Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 11;32(2):436–451. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4831-11.2012

Table 2.

Performance during lever press shaping and acquisition of visual discrimination in the training phase of the two-choice visual discrimination test

Phase Criterion Group Mean ± SEM
Shaping 19 of 24 trials (80%) on last day wt, SAL 24.0 ± 0.0
wt, POL 24.0 ± 0.0
Nurr1+/−, SAL 24.0 ± 0.0
Nurr1+/−, POL 24.0 ± 0.0
Acquisition 38 of 48 trials (80%) on last 2 d wt, SAL 47.5 ± 0.3
wt, POL 47.6 ± 0.1
Nurr1+/−, SAL 47.7 ± 0.2
Nurr1+/−, POL 47.8 ± 0.2

The table summarizes the mean ± SEM of correct responses during the initial lever press shaping and subsequent acquisition of visual discrimination processes for each of the four experimental groups, and further outlines the criterion to be reached in each phase. Neither genetic Nurr1 deficiency nor prenatal poly(I:C) exposure affected training performance, so that the four groups were highly comparable in the measure of correct responses during shaping and acquisition phases of the training phase. N(wt, SAL) = 7, N(wt, POL) = 7, N(Nurr1+/−, SAL) = 6, and N(Nurr1+/−, POL) = 6. SAL, Saline; POL, poly(I:C); wt, wild type; Nurr1+/−, heterozygous Nurr1 ablation.