Table 1.

No effect on other behaviors by either AIC or OFC inactivation

	AIC			OFC
	Saline	Mus + Bac		Saline	Mus + Bac
Amount gambling task
Correct rate in 40 forced choices (%)	100 ± 0	99.8 ± 0.1	ns	100 ± 0	99 0.9 ± 0.1	ns
Reaction time in 100 free choices (ms)	1260 ± 274	1560 ± 125	ns	1116 ± 156	1174 ± 91	ns
Number of reaction omission in whole session	0.56 ± 0.18	1.56 ± 0.50	ns	0.44 ± 0.18	1.00 ± 0.29	ns
Delay gambling task
Correct rate in 40 forced choices (%)	100 ± 0	100 ± 0	ns	100 ± 0	100 ± 0	ns
Reaction time in 100 free choices (ms)	1027 ± 63	1356 ± 190	ns	1019 ± 48	1001 ± 86	ns
Number of reaction omission in whole session	0.33 ± 0.21	1.42 ± 0.48	ns	1.17 ± 0.48	0.67 ± 0.33	ns

The effects of AIC or OFC inactivation on three behavioral parameters: correct rate in 40 forced choices, reaction time in 100 free choices, and number of reaction omissions in the whole session. There were no significant differences between inactivations and saline in both gambling tasks, suggesting that inactivations affected performance in risk taking and not other domains. Values are mean ± SEM. Mus + Bac, muscimol + baclofen; ns, not significant.