Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 21;32(47):16716–16724. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1744-12.2012

Table 2.

Group level activations from GLM analysis

Group level activations contrast Region X Y Z Voxels Max Z
Stimulus size lines R occ fusiform 8 −76 −2 704 3.83
R occ pole 16 −92 20 378 3.47
Stimulus size dots L occ pole −22 −98 −4 1188 4.64
R occ pole 14 −96 −10 766 4.83
Criterion size lines Temporal pole −34 8 −32 264 3.24
Criterion size dots Temporal fusiform −40 −16 −34 426 4.19
Difficulty
    Positive R IFG 50 10 26 720 4.04
R SPL 28 −56 38 793 3.97
dmPFC 8 22 42 718 4.11
    Negative L IPS −42 −64 34 3164 4.71
R IPS 50 −72 20 1850 4.07
PCC 8 −40 44 1368 4.51
L dlPFC −34 28 38 951 3.87
R IPS 20 −84 20 467 3.46
Motor L c gyrus −44 −20 58 9233 5.81
    Right hand R cerebellum 16 −60 −26 1999 5.69
R cerebellum 22 −70 −52 869 5.99
R c gyrus 42 −12 56 9836 5.63
    Left hand L cerebellum −18 −58 −30 1993 5.84
L cerebellum −14 −74 −50 257 3.65

Presented clusters were significant at the p < 0.05 level using cluster-based thresholding. Each contrast was relative to baseline. Voxel values are derived using a standard MNI-152 2 mm template. c, Cingulate; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; L, left; occ, occipital; R, right.