Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 11;3:13. doi: 10.1186/s41512-019-0059-4

Table 1.

Available methods for quantitative synthesis in prognostic factor research

Available data Estimate of interest Possible methods for evidence synthesis
AD Baseline characteristics Linear FOA Meta-regression [34]
Similarly adjusted FOAs Linear FOA Univariate meta-analysis [19], multivariate meta-analysis [20, 33, 57]
Non-linear FOA Univariate meta-analysis [36, 37], multivariate meta-analysis [35]
Not similarly adjusted FOAs Linear FOA Multivariate meta-analysis [33, 56, 57]
IPD Linear FOA One-stage meta-analysis [34, 38], two-stage meta-analysis [38], multivariate
meta-analysis [38, 56], graphical meta-analysis [98]
Non-linear FOA One-stage meta-analysis [34, 41], two-stage meta-analysis [37, 41], multivariate
meta-analysis [43]
IPD + AD Baseline characteristiscs Linear FOA Hierarchical-related regression [34]
Non-linear FOA Hierarchical-related regression [34]
Similarly adjusted FOAs Linear FOA Two-stage meta-analysis, hierarchical-related regression [49]
Non-linear FOA Two-stage meta-analysis [37], hierarchical-related regression [34]
Not similarly adjusted FOAs Linear FOA Multivariate meta-analysis [51, 56], adaptation method [53, 54]

FOA factor-outcome association