Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 11;14(7):e0219600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219600

Table 5. Negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity for studies with follow-up.

Study authors SP, n TP, n SN, n FN, n NPV, %
95% CI
Sensitivity, %
95% CI
Specificity, %
95% CI
Almenar Latorre 11 4 1521 0 100.0
99.9–100.0
100.0
51.0–100.0
99.5
99.6–99.8
Berninger n/a 57 n/a 0 n/a 100.0
93.7–100.0
n/a
Calcutt 1633 121 174187 10 100.0
100.0–100.0
92.4
86.5–95.8
99.1
99.1–99.2
Calevo 41 20 32217 0 100.0
100.0–100.0
100.0
83.9–100.0
99.9
99.9–100.0
Cao-Nguyen n/a 24 n/a 2 n/a 92.3
75.9–97.9
n/a
De Capua 1536 24 18164 1 100.0
100.0–100.0
96.0
80.5–99.3
92.3
91.9–92.7
Ng 37 3 1027 0 100.0
99.6–100.0
100.0
43.9–100.0
96.8
95.6–97.7
O'Connor 525 12 11213 1 100.0
100.0–100.0
92.3
66.7–98.6
95.6
95.2–96.0
Watkin n/a 32 n/a 4 n/a 88.9
74.7–95.6
n/a
Wessex 392 22 20887 2 100.0
100.0–100.0
91.7
74.2–97.7
98.3
98.1–98.4

CI: confidence intervals; FN: false negatives; n/a: not given or could not be calculated; NPV: negative predictive value: SN: screen negatives; SP: screen positives; TP: true positive