Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 22;15(4):280–287. doi: 10.1089/chi.2018.0332

Table 2.

Bias and Concordance Correlations Between Reference System and Prediction Equations

Equation Total sample (n = 46) Normal weight (n = 32) Overweight/obese (n = 14)
Bias (%) Correlation Bias (%) Correlation Bias (%) Correlation
Henry-1 16.7 ± 7.3 0.864 15.5 ± 7.7 0.810 19.4 ± 5.6 0.507
Henry-2 15.0 ± 7.6 0.885 13.7 ± 8.2 0.840 18.2 ± 4.9 0.558
Schofield 16.4 ± 7.5 0.863 16.6 ± 8.5 0.788 15.8 ± 5.0 0.626
WHO 18.4 ± 7.7 0.845 16.7 ± 8.0 0.790 22.2 ± 5.4 0.451
Muller 16.2 ± 8.1 0.853 17.9 ± 7.7 0.765 12.4 ± 7.9 0.654
Molnar 9.8 ± 8.1 0.931 7.8 ± 7.0 0.916 14.3 ± 8.8 0.588
Herrmann 6.9 ± 24.3 0.801 6.0 ± 21.7 0.773 8.9 ± 30.3 0.267
Schmelzle 26.1 ± 41.5 0.510 33.6 ± 43.9 0.378 9.0 ± 30.0 0.428
Harris–Benedict 13.8 ± 8.9 0.886 12.5 ± 9.8 0.833 16.9 ± 5.8 0.569

Prediction equation analysis only included subjects who were ≤18 years old. Bias as presented as a percent ± standard deviation.