Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 15;31(24):8958–8966. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1151-11.2011

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

HOKR adaptation induced by massed and spaced training protocols. Mice were trained using 800 cycles of 0.22 Hz, 15° screen oscillation using five different protocols (Fig. 1). A, Eight hundred cycles of massed training (M, n = 11). B, Spaced training with 4 × 200 cycles at 0.5 h intervals (S0.5 h, n = 5). C, Spaced training with 4 × 200 cycles at 1 h intervals (S1 h, n = 9). D, Spaced training with 4 × 200 cycles at 1 d intervals (S1d-1, n = 7). E, Spaced training with 8 × 100 cycles at 1 d intervals (S1d-2, n = 5). F, Comparison of gain increase immediately after (open columns) and 24 h after (filled columns) the end of training among the five protocols. The HOKR gain increase (%) is normalized to the mean gain at the start of training. Error bars indicate SE; *p < 0.05; ns, p > 0.05 (paired t test).