Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 5;31(40):14386–14398. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2451-11.2011

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Consistency of tuning preferences during grasp planning across the delayed grasping task and the brain control task. A, Consistency of grip type tuning in F5. The histogram indicates the proportion of multiunits that maintained the same preference for grip type in both tasks versus those that changed to the opposite type. B, Consistency of grip type tuning in AIP. In both areas, the vast majority of units did not change their preferred grip. C, Change of orientation tuning in F5 between delayed grasping and brain control. The histogram shows the proportion of units for which the preferred orientations were the same (0ο shift), highly similar (25ο shift), or further apart (50–100ο shift) in both tasks. D, Change of orientation tuning in AIP. Shifts of preferred orientation exceeding 25ο were rare.