Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 16;31(7):2511–2525. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5245-10.2011

Table 1.

Neuromotor measures

PRO
CTRL
ANTI
ON OFF ON OFF ON OFF
Grip strength (mN)
    10 months
        Mean 760 758 756
        Last trial 754 753 789
    14 months
        Mean 783 793 799 764 775 793
        Last trial 881 817 870 729 900 954
Rotarod (s, on rod)
    10 months
        Mean 173* 232 209
        Last trial 254 270 262
    14 months
        Mean 227 211 228 201 208 190
        Last trial 276 279 270 300 283 300
Activity (number of beam crossings)
    10 months 13,151 12,979 15,601
    14 months 8717 9605 7929 8562 7904 9475

There are only minor differences in motoric measures between transgenic and nontransgenic mice. Grip strength (in millinewtons) expressed as the mean of 10 successive trials did not differ between three groups (PRO, pro-aggregant; CTRL, control; ANTI, anti-aggregant). On the accelerating rotarod, all groups showed a learning curve across the four consecutive trials. Although pro-aggregant TauRD mice started with a lower performance (*p < 0.01), all groups showed a similar performance on the last trial. Also, total counts during a 23 h recording yielded approximately the same number of beam crossings for all three groups in the home cage activity (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). After switching off half of the mice in each group, no motor differences became noticeable (p > 0.05 for all comparisons).