Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 2;31(9):3453–3458. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2585-10.2011

Table 1.

Avoidance of electric shock and odors for the flies used for Figures 2 and 3

Shock avoidance [median (25/75 percentile)] 3-Octanol avoidance [mean (SEM)] 4-Methylcyclohexanol avoidance [mean (SEM)]
w− × RNAiB3C8 66.14 (58.75/80.62) 36.80 (3.75) 56.62 (3.44)
OK107 × RNAiB3C8 64.68 (56.22/70.41) 24.36 (5.70) 31.27 (5.86)
w− × OK107 70.03 (67.98/77.29) 32.46 (6.60) 25.31 (5.06)
MB247 × RNAiB3C8 69.70 (62.50/73.24) 49.15 (8.00) 58.96 (5.11)
w− × MB247 66.35 (61.79/71.96) 33.73 (5.45) 40.27 (6.04)
c739 × RNAiB3C8 61.90 (48.15/62.96) 32.33 (5.79) 41.05 (5.78)
w− × c739 62.07 (53.78/65.99) 29.11 (6.05) 35.46 (6.78)

None of the experimental groups are significantly different from their two respective controls, except for the comparison between OK107 × RNAiB3C8 and w− × RNAiB3C8 in the 4-methycyclohexanol avoidance (p < 0.05). n = 7–10.