Table 4.
Results of ERP amplitude analyses for the ERN and Pe
| Variance | ERN |
Pe |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| df | F | p | df | F | p | |
| Group | 1,28 | 5.00 | <0.05 | 1,28 | 0.63 | >0.43 |
| Group × Resp | 1,28 | 6.43 | <0.05 | 1,28 | 0.14 | >0.72 |
| Group × Resp × AP | 2,56 | 4.90 | <0.05 | 2,56 | 11.4 | <0.001 |
| Group × Resp × Lat | 2,56 | 2.13 | 0.13 | 2,56 | 3.48 | <0.05 |
| Group × Resp × AP × Lat | 4,112 | 8.38 | <0.001 | 4,112 | 3.28 | <0.05 |
| Incompatible correct response | ||||||
| Group | 1,28 | 0.12 | >0.7 | 1,28 | 0.14 | >0.72 |
| Group × AP × Lat | 4,112 | 0.55 | >0.65 | 4,112 | 0.82 | >0.47 |
| Incompatible erroneous response | ||||||
| Group | 1,28 | 8.98 | <0.005 | 1,28 | 0.89 | >0.36 |
| Group × AP × Lat | 4,112 | 10.50 | <0.001 | 4,112 | 1.79 | >0.17 |
| Control group | ||||||
| Resp | 1,14 | 41.21 | <0.001 | 1,14 | 4.67 | <0.05 |
| Resp × AP | 2,28 | 11.28 | <0.005 | 2,28 | 12.3 | <0.005 |
| Resp × Lat | 2,28 | 4.90 | <0.05 | 2,28 | 17.64 | <0.001 |
| Resp × AP × Lat | 4.56 | 22.70 | <0.001 | 4.56 | 6.37 | <0.005 |
| Thalamic patient group | ||||||
| Resp | 1,14 | 15.69 | <0.005 | 1,14 | 5.52 | <0.05 |
| Resp × AP | 2,28 | 1.25 | >0.3 | 2,28 | 2.16 | >0.16 |
| Resp × Lat | 2,28 | 3.28 | <0.1 | 2,28 | 8.01 | <0.01 |
| Resp × AP × Lat | 4.56 | 5.18 | <0.01 | 4.56 | 1.86 | >0.17 |
The upper part of the table shows the results of the omnibus ANOVA; below that, the results of planned comparisons are broken down by the factors response and group. Effects and interactions not listed are not significant. Resp, Response factor; AP, anterior–posterior factor; Lat, lateral factor; df, degrees of freedom.