Skip to main content
. 2019 May 11;11(5):e4642. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4642

Table 6. Numerical Statistics and Feedback Comments for the Different Workshop Stations that Students Identified as Their Favourite Station.

Plastic Surgery: Tendon Repair
Year   Size of Cohort Standard Deviation Number of Votes as Favourite Station Confidence Interval
2018 40 1.25 17 8.64 to 9.42  
2017 27 0.834 14 8.88 to 9.5  
Comments:
Category Number of Responses (%)
“Hands-on” practicality: interactivity and enjoyment, developing new skills and techniques, contact time with equipment, putting theory into practice, realism: “it felt real”  16 (51.6)
Surgeon interaction: quality of tuition, contact time with surgeons 9 (29.0)
Relevant to studies 3 (9.68)
Challenging and competitive aspects 3 (9.68)
Neurosurgery: Burr Holes  
Year   Size of Cohort Standard Deviation Number of Votes as Favourite Station Confidence Interval
2016 40 1.02 13 8.56 to 9.2  
Comments:
Category Number of Responses (%)
“Hands-on” practicality: interactivity and enjoyment, contact time with equipment, putting theory into practice, realism: “it felt real”  6 (46.2)
Challenging and competitive aspects  5 (38.5)
Surgeon interaction: contact time with surgeons  2 (15.4)
Laparoscopic Simulation
Year   Size of Cohort Standard Deviation Number of Votes as Favourite Station Confidence Interval
2018 40 1.30 10 8.50 to 9.30  
2017 27 0.834 9 8.50 to 9.13  
2016 40 0.947 14 8.49 to 9.07  
Comments:
Category Number of Responses (%)
“Hands-on” practicality: interactivity and enjoyment, developing new skills and techniques, contact time with equipment, putting theory into practice, realism: “it felt real” 22 (66.7)
Challenging and competitive aspects 6 (18.2)
Surgeon interaction: quality of tuition, contact time with surgeons 4 (12.1)
Variety of activities on offer 1 (3.03)
Vascular Surgery: Aortic Re-Anastomosis  
Year   Size of Cohort Standard Deviation Number of Votes as Favourite Station Confidence Interval
2018 40 1.43 6 8.29 to 9.17  
Comments:
Category Number of Responses (%)
“Hands-on” practicality: interactivity and enjoyment, developing new skills and techniques, time available to develop skills 3 (50.0)
Challenging and competitive aspects 2 (33.3)
Surgeon interaction: quality of tuition 1 (16.7)
ENT: Tracheostomy  
Year   Size of Cohort Standard Deviation Number of Votes as Favourite Station Confidence Interval
2018 40 1.46 5 7.93 to 8.83  
Comments:
Category Number of Responses (%)
“Hands-on” practicality: putting theory into practice 2 (40.0)
Relevant to studies 2 (40.0)
Surgeon interaction: quality of tuition 1 (20.0)
Suturing
Year   Size of Cohort Standard Deviation Number of Votes as Favourite Station Confidence Interval
2018 40 1.12 6 8.33 to 9.03  
2017 27 1.07 3 7.93 to 8.73  
2016 40 1.93 7 7.48 to 8.68  
Comments:
Category: Number of Responses (%)
“Hands-on” practicality: interactivity, time available to develop surgical skills with live tissue 7 (43.8)
Perception of learning useful skills for the future 5 (31.3)
Surgeon interaction: quality of tuition 3 (18.8)
Relevant to studies 1 (6.25)
Orthopaedic Surgery: Dynamic Hip Screw  
Year   Size of Cohort Standard Deviation Number of Votes as Favourite Station Confidence Interval
2017 27 1.58 2 6.66 to 7.86  
2016 40 1.05 5 8.03 to 8.67  
Comments:
Category Number of Response (%)
Triggering personal interest in this surgical field 3 (42.9)
“Hands-on” practicality: interactivity and enjoyment, putting theory into practice 2 (28.6)
Surgeon interaction: quality of tuition 1 (14.3)
Relevant to studies 1 (14.3)
Trauma Scenario: Conducting a Primary Survey  
Year   Size of Cohort Standard Deviation Number of Votes as Favourite Station Confidence Interval
2016 40 1.69 2 6.63 to 7.67  
Comments:
Category Number of Responses (%)
Triggering personal interest in this surgical field 1 (50.0)
Perception of learning useful skills for the future 1 (50.0)