Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 11;10:3061. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10940-4

Table 1.

Optimization of resolution of amino phenol 1a

graphic file with name 41467_2019_10940_Figa_HTML.gif
Entry 2 Cat Solvent Conv. (%)b Product, ee (%)c 1a, ee (%)c S d
1 2a A CH2Cl2 30 3a, 60 26 5
2 2a B CH2Cl2 26 3a, −26 −9 2
3 2a C CH2Cl2 76 3a, −7 −23 1.4
4e 2a D CH2Cl2 5 3a, 73 4 6.6
5 2a E CH2Cl2 28 3a, 74 29 9
6e 2a F CH2Cl2 9 3a, 78 8 8.7
7 2a E CH3CN 80 3a, 22 90 4
8 2a E THF 28 3a, 20 8 1.6
9 2a E EtOAc 28 3a, 36 14 2.4
10 2a E 1:1 CH2Cl2/CH3CN 62 3a, 50 82 7
11f 2b E 1:1 CH2Cl2/CH3CN 60 4a, 65 98 21
12g 2b E 1:1 CH2Cl2/CH3CN 39 4a, 86 55 23

aUnless noted otherwise, the reactions were performed with 1a (0.04 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), 2 (0.8 equiv.), catalyst (20 mol%) in solvent (0.5 mL) at 24 oC for 4 h

bDetermined by 1H NMR

cDetermined by chiral HPLC

dS= ln[(1 − Conv.)(1 − ee1a)]/ln[(1 − Conv.)(1 + ee1a)]

e15 h instead of 4 h

fThe reaction time was 24 h

gUse of 10 mol% E and with 24 h reaction time