Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 27;39(8):875–883. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy221

Table 3.

Lactation Complications Reported by Women Who Breast-fed After Primary Breast Augmentation

No. of live births Silicone implants Saline implants Silicone/saline
Single birth (n = 2393) Multiple birth (n = 616) Single birth (n = 1331) Multiple birth (n = 339) Odds ratiob
(90% CI)
Adjusted odds ratiob (90% CI)
Complication, no. (%)a
 Not enough milk production 470 (19.6) 238 (18.3) 264 (19.8) 127 (17.9) 1.00 (0.89, 1.12) 0.94 (0.83, 1.06)c
 Mastitis 97 (4.1) 68 (5.2) 49 (3.7) 33 (4.6) 1.12 (0.89, 1.40) 1.12 (0.89, 1.41)d
 Excess pain 77 (3.2) 51 (3.9) 59 (4.4) 18 (2.5) 0.92 (0.72, 1.17) 0.96 (0.75, 1.22)e
 Nipple inversion 24 (1.0) 10 (0.8) 17 (1.3) 3 (0.4) 0.94 (0.59, 1.50) 1.00 (0.63, 1.60)e
 Too much milk production 14 (0.6) 9 (0.7) 17 (1.3) 8 (1.1) 0.51 (0.31, 0.81) 0.52 (0.32, 0.84)f
 Other 64 (2.7) 36 (2.8) 39 (2.9) 15 (2.1) 1.02 (0.77, 1.36) 1.03 (0.78, 1.37)g

aPercentages based on total number of live births. bEstimated from a Logistic Regression model. Saline is the reference group. cModel adjusted for the following covariates: breast-feeding difficulty history, body mass index, incision site, miscarriage history, and smoking status. dModel adjusted for miscarriage history. eModel adjusted for the following covariates: current alcohol consumption, race, and smoking status. fModel adjusted for covariate of race. gModel adjusted for education level.