Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 12.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Mar;169(3):247–255. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3158

Table 2.

Tolerability and Reasons for Discontinuation Among Children in the Modified Intention-to-Treat Population

Patients, No. (%)
Characteristic Isoniazid (n = 434) Rifapentine Plus Isoniazid (n = 471) P Valuea Difference (95% CI)b
Treatment completion 351 (80.9) 415 (88.1) .003 −7.2 (−2.0 to −2.5)

Reason for not completing treatment

 All reasons 83 (19.2) 56 (11.9) .003 7.2 (2.5 to 12.0)

 Discontinuation because of AEc 2 (0.5) 8 (1.7) .11 −1.2 (−2.6 to 0.1)

 Withdrawal of informed consent 5 (1.2) 4 (0.9) .74 0.3 (−1.0 to 1.6)

 Lost for ≥3 mo during treatment 26 (6.0) 5 (1.1) <.001 4.9 (2.5 to 7.4)

 Physician decision to cancel other than AE 7 (1.6) 3 (0.6) .21 1.0 (−0.4 to 2.4)

 Participant refusal 15 (3.5) 16 (3.4) >.99 0.1 (−2.3 to 2.4)

 Total dose count and/or administration period outside of protocol guidelinesd 28 (6.5) 20 (4.3) .18 2.2 (−0.7 to 5.2)

Abbreviation: AE, adverse event.

a

P value based on Fisher exact test.

b

95% CI for the difference in proportions using the Wilson Score Interval method.

c

Combination-therapy group included 3 influenza-like AEs (grade 2), 3 cutaneous (all with pruritic rash [2 were grade 2], 1 with oral blisters and fever [grade 3]), and 2 gastrointestinal reactions (1 was grade 1 and 1 was grade 2). Isoniazid-only group included 1 cutaneous AE (grade 2) and 1 gastrointestinal reaction (grade 3).

d

Measure of adherence.