Table 2.
Association between TyG index (dependent variable) with energy and macronutrient consumption in patients with heart disease
| Consumption (% energy) | Model 1: TyG index tertiles | Model 2: TyG index tertiles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (lowest) | 2 | 3 (highest) | 1 (lowest) | 2 | 3 (highest) | |
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||||
| Energy | 0.9 (0.9–1.0) | 0.9 (0.9–1.0) | 0.9 (0.9–1.0) | 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | ||
| Carbohydrates (%) | ||||||
| 45–65 | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | ||||
| < 45 | 0.9 (0.7–1.3) | 1.1 (0.9–1.4) | 0.9 (0.7–1.3) | 1.1 (0.8–1.4) | ||
| > 65 | 0.7 (0.5–1.1) | 0.5 (0.3–0.7) | 0.8 (0.5–1.1) | 0.5 (0.3–0.8) | ||
| Proteins (%) | ||||||
| 15–20 | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | ||
| < 15 | 0.9 (0.7–1.3) | 0.9 (0.7–1.3) | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | 1.0 (0.7–1.4) | ||
| > 20 | 0.9 (0.8–1.2) | 1.2 (0.9–1.4) | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | 1.2 (0.9–1.5) | ||
| Lipids (%) | ||||||
| 25–35 | 1 (Ref.) | 1 (Ref.) | ||||
| < 25 | 0.8 (0.6–0.9) | 0.6 (0.5–0.8) | 0.8 (0.6–1.0) | 0.7 (0.5–0.9) | ||
| > 35 | 0.8 (0.6–1.2) | 0.9 (0.7–1.2) | 0.8 (0.6–1.2) | 0.8 (0.6–1.1) | ||
Data are odds ratio (95% CI) based in multinomial logistic regression
Italic values show the presence of statistic significance
Model 1: crude
Model 2: adjusted by sex, age, use of hypoglycemic, antihypertensive, anticoagulant and lipid-lowing agents