Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 4;25:4952–4959. doi: 10.12659/MSM.914352

Table 3.

Multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival in non-APL and intermediate-risk AML cases.

Prognostic factors Non-APL AML Intermediate-risk AML
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
Sex (Male vs. Female) 1.136 (0.713–1.812) 0.591 0.876 (0.512–1.498) 0.629
Age (≤60 vs. >60 years) 1.384 (0.905–2.117) 0.134 1.116 (0.642–1.939) 0.698
WBC (≥30×109/L vs. <30×109/L) 1.209 (0.776–1.884) 0.401 1.499 (0.882–2.548) 0.134
PLT (100×109/L vs. 100×109/L) 1.340 (0.766–2.343) 0.305 1.074 (0.528–2.184) 0.845
Karyotypic classifications (favorable vs. intermediate vs. poor) 1.683 (1.251–2.266) 0.001
POU5F1B expression (high vs. low) 0.453 (0.241–0.852) 0.014 0.448 (0.225–0.896) 0.023
IDH1/2 mutation (mutant vs. wild-type) 4.470 (1.860–10.740) 0.001 5.732 (2.197–14.960) 0.000
IDH2 R140 mutation (mutant vs. wild-type) 0.650 (0.118–3.585) 0.621 0.636 (0.102–3.948) 0.627
U2AF1 mutation (mutant vs. wild-type) 2.452 (1.013–5.931) 0.047 2.206 (0.831–5.858) 0.112
SRSF2 mutation (mutant vs. wild-type) 1.339 (0.540–3.321) 0.529 2.032 (0.766–5.390) 0.154