Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 12.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Dec 3;123:149–164. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.11.020

Table 1:

Characteristics of Study Participants

Citation Sample
size
Length
of
follow-
up
(month)
Age at
baseline
(years)
mean (SD)
Sex
(%
female)
Setting;
Race/ethnicity
BMI at
baseline
(kg/m2)
mean (SD)
FPG at
baseline
(mmol/L)
mean
(SD)
HbAlc at
baseline
(%)
mean
(SD)
Insulin at baseline
(μU/ml)
mean (SD)
Inclusion criteria Sampling
method
Attrition
(%)

Ackermann et al. 2008 92 12 58.3 (10.1) 55.4 Community (YMCA) Indianapolis Indiana 81.5% white 12.0% black 31.4 (4.9) NR 5.6 (0.5) NR People with ADA risk score>10 and casual capillary blood glucose (CCBG) of 6.1–11.0 mmol/L Recruited from YMCA by a community- based screening 32.6%
Almeida et al. 2011 53 12 range: 20–29: 12 30–39: 26 >40:15 18.9 Clinic Sao Paulo Brazil 23.3 (2.7) 4.7 (0.6) NR NR Aged 20–59yrs; without hyperlipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperglycemia, obesity, cancer, anabolic, or corticosteroid drugs use, or pregnancy Recruited from a reference HIV clinic 20.8%
Anderson et al. 2014
Craigie etal. 2011
329 12 63.6 (6.8) 26.0 Community Scotland UK 99.0% white 1.0% others 30.7 (4.2) 6.1(2.0) 6.0(1.1) 10.6(8.6) HOMA-IR: 3.0 (2.9) Aged 50–74yrs; BMI>25kg/m2; with polypectomy for adenoma, without pregnancy, DM Recruited from a bowel screening program 7.3%
Anderssen et al.& 1998 Jacobs et al. 2009 The ODES Investigators 1993 Torjesen et al.1997 219 12 44.9 (2.5) 9.6 Community Oslo Norway 28.8(3.4) 5.6 (0.7) NR 23.2(13.3) BMI>24 kg/m2DBP: 86–99 mmHg TC: 5.20–7.74 mmol/L HDL-C<1.2 mmol/L Fasting TG>1.4 mmol/L Recruited from a continuously ongoing screening program in Oslo 4.6%
Arguin et al. 2012 25 12 60.5 (6.0) 100.0 Community Sherbrooke Quebec Canada NR (body weight mean (SD) 79.6 (10.7) 5.0 (0.4) NR NR Sedentary obese postmenopausal women without: (1) abnormal fasting lipid profile; (2) CVD; and (3) DM Using a computergenerated randomization list 12.0%
Bazzano et al. 2014 148 12 46.8(10.1) 88.5 Community New Orleans LA 45.3% white 51.4% black 2.0% Hispanic 35.4 (4.2) 5.2 (0.6) NR 17.3 (10.0) Obese people (BMI: 30–45 kg/m2) without DM and CVD Recruited from community screening and TV ads 17.8%
Bo et al. 2007&2009 375 48.0 55.7(5.7) 58.2 Community Asti Italy 29.7 (4.4) 5.8 (0.8) NR median (interquartile range) 20.4 (24.0) for IG; 21.3 (31.2) for CG People with MetS defined by FPG>6.1 mmol/L, without DM and CVD Recruited from a metabolic screening program 10.7%
Bouchonville et al. 2014 Villareal et al. 2011 107 12.0 69.7 (4.0) 62.6 Community St. Louis MO 37.2 (5.0) 5.5 (0.6) NR 16.6(10.6) HOMA-IR: 4.2 (3.0) Old (>65yrs) and obese (>30 kg/m2) people without DM Recruited from ads 13.0%
Brinkworth et al. 2004 58 12 50.2 (NR) 77.6 Community Adelaide Australia 34.0 (NR) 5.4 (0.2) NR 16.0(1.3) HOMA-IR: 3.8 (0.4) Obese, hyperinsulinemic persons aged 20–65yrs, insulin >12 mu/1 without DM, NR 25.9%
Broekhuizen et al. 2012 340 12 45.3 (12.9) 56.7 Community Amsterdam The Netherland 26.5 (5.0) 4.9 (0.9) NR NR Aged 18–70 yrs, with familial hypercholesterolemia, a LDL-C level>75th percentile Recruited from the national cascade screening program 7.4%
Burke et al. 2007 & 2008 241 36 56.2(7.3) 55.6 Community Perth Australia 30.1 (2.7) 5.0 (0.9) NR 1.8 (0.9) HOMA-IR: 2.4 (1.7) Overweight, age>40yrs using 1 or 2 drugs to treat HT >3 months without DM, chronic renal failure, CVD Recruited bymediaadvertising 16.2%
Burtscher et al. 2009&2012 36 12 57.5 (6.9) 55.6 Clinic Innsbruck Austria 29.0 (3.9) 6.0 (0.4) NR NR Patients with IFG (FPG: 5.6– 6.9 mmol/L), aged 40–65yrs; BMI>25 kg/m2, and without DM Recruited byphysiciansthroughmemberscreening 0.0%
Choo et al. 2014 110 12 43.1 (9.0) 100.0 Community Seoul South Korea 28.5 (3.8) 5.0 (0.8) NR NR Aged 18–65yrs; elevated waist circumference (>85cm), abdominal obesity without DM and CVD Recruited via poster, leaflet, telephone, and ads 55.5%
Clifton et al. 2008 119 12 49.0 (9.0) 100.0 Community Adelaide Australia 32.8(3.5) 6.1 (0.6) NR 9.9 (4.7) Women, aged 20–65yrs, BMI:27–40kg/m2, without DM, or renal or liver disease Recruited from public ads and screened by questionnaires 33.6%
Cole et al. 2013 94 12 58.3 (9.6 46.0 Community San Antonio Texas 64.0% white 17.0% black 19.0% Flispanic 30.8 (4.9) 6.1 (0.5) 5.9 (0.5) NR Aged 18yrs+; without DM, but with pre-DM, by ADA IFG (5.6–6.9 mmol/L) Recruited from a pre-DM education class 31.0%
Coon et al. 1989 20 12 59.5 (7.5) 0.0 Community Baltimore MD 29.0 (3.0) 5.4 (0.5) NR 13.0(6.0) Aged 45yrs+, healthy persons without DM Recruited by ads 0.0%
Cox et al 2006 & 2008 & 2010 116 12 55.5 (4.7) 100.0 Community Berth Australia 26.4 (3.3) 5.1 (0.4) NR 6.2 (3.9) Aged 50–70 yrs; BMI<34 kg/m2; non-smoker, with sedentary lifestyle, without DM Recruited by ads. 25.9%
Ditschuneit et al. 1999 & 2001 100 24 45.7(10.6) 79.0 Clinic sUlm Germany 33.4 (3.6) 5.0 (0.6) NR 21.5 (8.1) Age>18yrs, BMI between 25 and 40 kg/m2 without endocrine disorders Recruited by referring to the obesity clinics 27.0%
Donnelly et al. 2000 22 18 51.5 (8.5) 100.0 Community Kearney NE 31.2 (4.0) 5.5 (0.8) NR 14.0 (9.8) BMI>25 kg/m2, low aerobic capacity, at risk for continued weight gain NR 0.0%
Esposito et al. 2003 120 24 34.6 (5.0) 100.0 Clinic Naples Italy 34.9 (2.4) 5.9 (0.8) NR 14.0 (4.0) HOMA-IR: 3.7 (0.5) Obese premenopausal women, aged 20–46yrs; without DM, IGT (7.8–11.0 mmol/L), CAD, pregnancy. OGTT confirmed Recruited from a outpatient department 6.7%
Esposito et al. 2004a 110 24 43.3 (5.0) 0.0 Clinic Naples Italy 36.7 (2.4) 5.8 (0.6) NR 20.0 (7.5) Obese men with erectile dysfunction, aged 35–55yrs; without DM and IGT, OGTT confirmed Recruited from a outpatient department list 5.5%
Esposito et al. 2004b (JAMA v.292) & 2009 180 24 43.9 (6.2) 45.0 Clinic Naples Italy 28.0 (3.3) 6.3 (0.6) NR 15.5 (6.5) HOMA: 3.8 (0.7) Sedentary people with MetS defined by FPG>6.1 mmol/L, Recruited from a screening program 8.9%
Fatouros et al. 2005 50 12 70.4(3.8) 0.0 Community Alexandroupolis Greece 29.5 (3.3) 5.9 (0.7) NR 14.2(3.1) HOMA-IR: 3.7 (2.8) Inactive old men, nonsmoker, without DM, FPG<7 mmol/L Recruited from a volunteer database in localcommunity 0.0%
Fernandez et al. 2012 40 12 40.9(13.5) 67.5 Community Leon Spain 31.8(2.4) 4.6 (0.9) NR 21.2(27.4) Aged 18–70yrs; BMI: 28–35 kg/m2; without DM and pregnancy Recruited from a clinic trial 60.0%
Ferrara et al. 2012 188 24 56.4(9.5) 47.9 Clinic Naples Italy 29.2 (4.5) 5.6 (1.5) NR NR People with HT Recruited from a outpatient clinic 0.0%
Fisher et al. 2012 97 12 age range: 21–46 y 100.0 Community Birmingham AL 46.4% white 53.6% black 28.0(1.0) 4.8 (0.4) NR 11.4(3.6) Aged 21–46yrs; BMI: 27–30 kg/m2; non-smoker, with sedentary lifestyle premenopausal women Recruited from a previous parent study 0.0%
Fogelholm et al. 2000 82 24 age range: 30–45y 100.0 Community Tampere Finland 34.0 (3.6) 5.1 (0.5) NR 12.7(5.2) Aged 30–45yrs, BMI: 30–45 kg/m2, physically inactive Recruited by ads 9.8%
Fonolla et al. 2009 297 12 46.0 (8.4) 15.5 Community Granada Spain 28.8(5.0) 5.6 (1.9) NR NR People with moderate risk of CVD, without DM, or pregnancy Recruited from a screening program 14.8%
Frank et al. 2005 173 12 60.7 (6.7) 100.0 Community Seattle Washington 30.4 (3.9) 5.4 (0.5) NR 17.9(8.3) HOMA: 4.4 (2.2) Postmenopausal women, aged 50–75yrs, sedentary at baseline BMI>25 kg/m2 without DM, nonsmoker Recruited through mailings and media ads 1.7%
Groeneveld et al. 2008 & 2010 816 12 46.6 (9.0) 0.0 Community Amsterdam The Netherlands 28.5 (3.5) NR 5.7 (0.4) NR Male construction workers with elevated risk of CVD Recruited from periodical health screening 27.6%
Fleshka et al. 2003 423 24 44.5 (10.0) 84.6 Clinics NY, Medison, Baton Rouge, Boulder, Davis, Durham, Woodbury 33.7 (3.6) 5.0 (0.7) NR 18.0 (9.5) (IU/L) Aged 18–65yrs; BMI: 27–40 kg/m2; with FPG<7.8 mmol/L Recruited from existing clinic records, or by ads 27.0%
Imayama et al. 2013Foster-Schubert et al. 2012 Mason et al. 2011&2013 439 12 58.0(5.0) 100.0 Community Seattle WA 85.0% white 30.9 (4.1) 5.4 (0.5) NR 12.9(8.1) HOMA-IR: 3.1 (2.1) Aged 50–75yrs; BMI: >25 kg/m2; <100 min/w PA; postmenopausal; without DM; FPG<7.0 mmol/I, Recruited from mass mailing ads 9.1%
Kanaya et al. 2012 Delgadillo et al. 2010 238 12 56.5 (16.5) 73.5 Community Berkeley, Oakland, etc CA22.5% white 23.0% black 37.0% Hispanic 30.0 (5.7) 5.2 (0.7) NR NR Aged 25yrs+; a capillary blood glucose:5.9–8.9 mmol/L, without DM Recruited from a community- based education outreach 12.2%
Kanaya et al. 2014 180 12 55.0 (7.0) 72.0 Clinics San Francisco, San Diego CA65.0% white 34.3 (6.7) 5.8 (0.7) 5.9 (0.4) 27.5 (17.6) HOMA-IR: 7.2 (5.1) Aged 21–65yrs; with MetS (FPG:5.6–6.9 mmol/L), HT, and underactive lifestyle (<150min/w of moderate intensity activity), without DM Recruited by ads and flyers in community and clinical settings 21.1%
Katula et al. 2010&2011&2013 301 24 57.9(9.5) 57.5 Community Winston-Salem NC 73.8% white 24.6% black 32.7 (4.0) 5.9 (0.6) NR 16.7(9.8) HOMA-IR: 4.4 (2.9) Patients with pre-DM defined by FPG of 5.3–6.9 mmol/L and BMI of 25–39 kg/m2 and without DM and CVD Recruited from mass mailing, community health fair or referrals 12.6%
Kawano et al. 2009 217 17 60.9(13.8) 66.5 Community Saga City Japan 23.7 (4.4) 5.1 (0.5) 5.1 (0.3) NR People with FPG: 5.6–7.8 mmol/L, or HbAlc: 5.5–6.0% Recruited from health checkup 27.2%
Keogh et al. 2007 36 12 48.6 (5.2) 68.0 Community Adelaide Australia 32.9 (4.5) 5.9 (0.5) NR 14.8(11.0) Overweight or obese people, aged 20–65yrs; BMI: 27–40 kg/m2; without DM, with FPG<7.0 mmol/L Recruited from newspaper ads 30.6%
Lawton et al. 2009 1089 24 58.9(6.9) 100.0 Clinics Wellington New Zealand 29.2 (6.0) 5.0 (0.6) 5.5 (0.6) 6.9 (4.7) Physically inactive women, aged 40–74yrs without medical condition Recruited by invitation letters or practice register 7.4%
Lim et al. 2010 113 12 47.0 (10.0) 82.3 Community Adelaide Australia 32.0(6.0) 5.4 (0.6) NR 9.1 (4.6) Aged 20–65yrs, BMI: 28–40 kg/m2, with at least one CVD risk factor, without DM Recruited by ads 38.9%
Lombard et al. 2010 250 12 40.4 (4.8) 100.0 Community Melbourne Australia 27.8(5.4) 4.6 (0.4) NR NR Women with a child in schools without pregnancy and serious medical conditions Recruited by invitation in school newsletter 14.0%
Ma et al. 2009&2013 241 15 52.9(10.6) 47.0 Clinic San Francisco CA78.0% white 17.0% Asian 32.0 (5.4) 5.6 (0.5) NR NR Patients with age>18 yrs, BMI>25 kg/m2, with pre-DM defined by FPG of 5.6–6.9 mmol/L, or MetS Recruited from a single primary care clinic 8.3%
Marsh etal. 2010 96 12 30.2(5.2) 100.0 Clinic Sydney Australia 34.5 (4.2) 4.8 (0.7) NR 15.6(10.8) Women, aged 18–40yrs; BMI<25 kg/m2, with polycystic ovary syndrome, without pregnancy and DM Recruited from a screening program 49.0%
McAuley et al. 2005&2006 93 12 Range: 30– 70y 100.0 Community Dunedin New Zealand 35.7 (5.0) 5.1 (0.6) NR 13.9(6.9) Overweight women, aged 30– 70yrs; BMI>27 kg/m2; without pregnancy Recruited by local ads 18.3%
Mellberg et al. 2014 70 24 59.9(5.7) 100.0 Community Umea Sweden 32.7 (3.5) 5.2 (1.1) NR 8.7 (4.4) Postmenopausal non-smoking women, BMI>27 kg/m2, without DM, FPG<7.0 mmol/L Recruited by newspapers ads 30.0%
Muto et al. 2001 326 18 42.5 (3.7) 0.0 Community Tokyo Japan 24.7 (3.0) 5.6 (1.3) NR NR Male workers with at least one abnormality, including FPG>5.6 mmol/L Recruited from a building maintenance company 7.4%
Narayan et al. 1998 95 12 Range: 25– 50y 75.8 Community Pima AZ Range:20.2–59.9 Range: 4.2–6.5 Range: 4.5–6.3 Range: 24–137 (pM) Overweight or obese people, aged 25–54yrs; BMI>25kg/m2, without DM, OGTT<7.8 mmol/L Recruited from an ongoing epidemiological study 2.0%
Nilsson et al. 1992 94 12 55.0 (7.2) NR Community Dalby Sweden Weight(kg):81.4(11.6) 5.0 (0.5) NR 17.6 (8.9) Patients with or without FIT, but no DM Recruited from a cross- sectional study 8.5%
Nilsson et al 2001 113 18 49.7 (6.2) 60.9 Community Flelsingborg Sweden 27.8(5.6) 4.9 (1.2) NR 8.7 (5.7) Aged 40–50yrs; with a cardiovascular risk score sum of >9 Recruited from a screening program 18.6%
Ockene et al. 2012 Merriam et al. 2009 312 12 52.0(11.2) 74.4 Community Lawrence MA 33.9 (5.6) 5.8 (0.7) NR 20.0(13.6) HOMA-IR: 5.2 (3.8) Age>25yrs+, BMI>24kg/m2, with risk for DM, but without DM Recruited from the Greater Lawrence Family Flealth Center patient panel 7.4%
Poston et al. 2006 250 12 41.0(8.5) 92.4 Community Huston TX 36.1 (3.1) 4.5 (0.7) NR NR Overweight or obese people, aged 25–55yrs; BMI: 27–40 kg/m2; without DM or pregnancy for women, FPG<7.0 mmol/L, confirmed byOGTT Recruited from a screening program 45.6%
Potteiger et al. 2003 & 2002 66 16 NR 57.6 Community Denver CO Range: 25– 34.9 5.5 (0.4) NR 11.4(4.4) Sedentary people without DM and heart disease Recruited from part of the Midwest Exercise Trial 10.1%
Reid etal. 2014 426 12 51.5 (11.6) 61.3 Clinic Ottawa Canada 95.3% white 29.4 (5.7) 5.1 (0.6) NR NR Obese people with coronary risk, without DM, pregnancy, FPG<7.0 mmol/L Recruited from a care cardiac center by ads and flyers 25.8%
Rossner et al. 1997 93 12 41.0 (NR) 67.7 Clinics Stockhlom Sweden 38.7 (4.5) 5.2 (1.3) NR NR Obese people with BMI> 30 kg/m2, without DM Recruited from hospital waiting list 38.7%
Ryttig et al. 1997 81 28 42.5 (10) 54.3 Clinics Stockhlom Sweden 37.7 (4.6) 5.5 (1.2) NR NR Obese people, aged 21–64yrs; BMI:>30 kg/m2; without DM or pregnancy Recruited from hospital waiting list 4.9%
Sartorelli et al. 2005 104 12 45.5 (9.1) 79.8 Community Sao Paulo Brazil 28.7 (2.5) 5.2 (0.5) NR NR Overweight or obese people, aged 30–65yrs; BMI: 24–35 kg/m2; without DM, or pregnancy Recruited from a screening program of high-risk group for DM, or from ads 31.7%
Simkin-Silverman et al. 1995 & 1998 & 2003Kuller et al. 2001 &2006&2012 535 54 47.0(1.0) 100.0 Community Allegheny PN 92.0% white 25.1 (3.3) 5.4 (0.8) NR NR Premenopausal women, aged 44–50yrs; BMI: 20–34 kg/m2; FPG<7.8 mmol/L Recruited from the Women’s Healthy Lifestyle Project 2.8%
Staten et al. 2004 361 12 57.2 (4.8) 100.0 Community Tucson AZ 100% Hispanics 29.5 (5.3) 5.9 (2.5) NR NR Uninsured Hispanic women, age>50yrs, Recruited from clinicregistration 33.4%
Stefanick et al. 1998 377 12 52.1 (7.3) 47.7 Community Palo Alto CA 26.7 (3.0) 5.3 (0.5) NR NR Postmenopausal women, aged 45–64yrs; men aged 30–64yrs; without DM, FPG<7.8 mmol/L, OGTT confirmed Recruited from the Diet and Exercise for Elevated Risk Trial 27.0%
Tapsell et al. 2014 120 12 48.9 (9.3) 75.0 Community Wollongong Australia 30.0(2.7) 5.3 (0.5) NR Median (IQR): 10.7 (7.5–13.7) for IG 11.4(8.3– 15.1) for CG Healthy adults aged 18–65yrs, BMI: 25–35 kg/m2, without DM Recruited by ads in the local media 22.5%
ter Bogt et al. 2009 457 12 56.1 (7.8) 57.9 Community Bilthoven The Netherlands 29.6 (3.4) 5.2 (0.6) NR NR Overweight or obese people, aged 40–70yrs; BMI: 25–40 kg/m2; with HT or dyslipidemia, without DM Recruited from a screening program 9.0%
Thompson et al. 2005 90 12 41.4(8.9) 85.6 Clinic Knoxville TN 34.8(3.1) 5.2 (0.5) NR 11.0(6.5) Obese people, aged 25–70yrs; BMI: 30–40 kg/m2; without DM or pregnancy Recruited from ad posters 13.3%
Tsai et al. 2010 50 12 49.4(11.9) 88.0 Clinic Philadelphia PN 19.0% white 81.0% black 36.5 (6.0) 5.5 (1.5) NR NR Overweight or obese people with BMI: 27–50 kg/m2, without serious psychiatric illness Recruited from flyers, and referrals from PCPs 6.0%
Vainionpaa et al. 2007 120 12 Range: 35– 40y 100.0 Community Oulu Finland 25.3 (4.6) 4.8 (0.5) NR 4.9 (3.3) Women aged 35–40yrs, without chronic disease Recruited from the National Population Register of Finland 33.3%
Vetter et al. 2013 Wadden et al. 2011 390 24 51.5 (11.5) 79.7 Clinic Philadelphia PA 59.0% white 38.5%black 38.5 (4.7) 5.8 (1.8) NR 13.5 (10.0) HOMA-IR: 3.4 (2.9) Aged 21yrs+; BMI: 30–50 kg/m2; with MetS (FPG> 6.1 mmol/L); without cardiovascular events Recruited from primary care practices 13.8%
von Thiele Schwarz et al. 2008 195 12 46.6(10.8) 100.0 Community Stockholm Sweden NR 5.0 (0.5) 4.4 (0.3) NR Working age women without DM and pregnancy Recruited from a public dental health care organization 9.2%
Watanabe et al. 2003 173 12 55.1 (7.1) 0.0 Community Tokyo Japan 24.4 (2.9) 5.8 (0.6) NR NR Male workers with risk for DM, aged 35–70yrs; OGTT confirmed Recruited from annual checkup list 9.8%
Weinstock et al. 1998 45 23 43.3 (7.4) 100.0 Community Syracuse NY 35.9 (6.0) 5.1 (0.6) NR 15.4 (6.9) Women without DM, CAD, and pregnancy Recruited from a cohort study 0.0%
Weiss et al. 2006 48 12 56.8 (3.0) 63.2 Community St. Louis MO 27 .3 (2 . 1) 5.3 (0.4) NR 7.8 (5.1) Sedentary people, aged 50– 60yrs; BMI:23.5–29.9kg/m2; non-smoker without DM. FPG<7.0 mmol/L, OGTT confirmed Recruited from a screening program 4.2%
Wing et al. 1995 202 18 37.4 (5.3) 48.1 Community Pittsburgh PA 30 .9 (2 . 1 ) 5.5 (0.7) NR 27.1 (15.6) Aged 25–45yrs; 13.6–31.8 kg above ideal body weight, without serious disease Recruited from newspaper or radio ads 21.3%
Wing et al. 1998 154 24 45.7 (4.4) 79.0 Community Pittsburgh PA 3 5 . 9 ( 4.3) 5.9 (0.6) 7.2 (0.5) 15.9 (13.4) Overweight people, aged 40– 55yrs; with diabetic parents Recruited from newspaper ads 22.0%
Wycherley et al. 2012 123 12 50.8 (9.3) 0.0 Clinic Adelaide Australia 33 . 0 (3.9) 5.8 (0.7) NR 10.0 (6.7) Overweight or obese males, aged 20–65yrs; BMI: 27–40 kg/m2, without DM Recruited by a screening program 44.7%

Mean (SD)
Total Range
1394320-1089 12–54 50.9 (8.4) 0–100 30.1 (4.4) 23.3–38.7 5.3 (1.0) 5.4 (0.6) 13.7 (9.0) HOMA-IR: 3.9 (2.8) 0–60.0

Abbreviations: BG: blood glucose; BMI: body mass index; CAD: coronary Artery Disease; CVD: cardiovascular disease; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; DM: diabetes mellitus; FBG: fasting blood glucose; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; HbAlc: glycated hemoglobin A1c; HDL: high density cholesterol; HT: hypertension; IGT: impaired glucose tolerance; LDL: low density cholesterol MetS: metabolic syndrome; NR: not reported; OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; PCP: primary care physician; PG: plasma glucose; SD: standard deviation