Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Vocat Behav. 2018 May 4;107:246–260. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2018.05.001

Table 5.

Unstandardized indirect effects of the recession transition (combined sample, weighted)

Physical
health
Mental
health
Organizational
commitment
Specific indirect effectsa b (95% BC CI) b (95% BC CI) b (95% BC CI)
via job insecurity −.03* (−.083; −.001) −.13* (−.228; −.056) −.17* (−.268; −.079)
−.03 (−.075; .004) −.13* (−.256, −.053) −.19* (−.296; −.089)
via employment insecurity −.18* (−.311; −.100) −.19* (−.323; −.094) .04 (−.027; .111)
−.17* (−.296; −.090) −.19* (−.368; −.084) .10* (.038; .181)

Note: N=4,676. b = standardized indirect effects. BC CI represents bias-corrected confidence intervals, which were based on 5,000 bootstrap samples.

a

In order to show the impact of controlling for the 12 demographic covariates and the prerecession and post-recession trend variables on the indirect associations of the recession transition variable with physical health, mental health, and organizational commitment, two sets of indirect effects are presented. Non-italicized coefficients (top) adjust for the covariates, and italicized coefficients (bottom) do not adjust for the covariates.

*

95% BC CI does not include zero.