Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Apr 8;51(7):876–884. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.02.010

Table 1.

Characteristics of participants who had food security score, child dietary quality, & child body mass index scores at both timepoints (n=137)

Baseline 18 months post-baseline
Characteristic Levels n or mean % or SD n or mean % or SD
Household Food Security Status High or marginal food security 74 54.0% 88 64.3%
Low food security 39 28.5% 28 20.4%
Very low food security 24 17.5% 21 15.3%
Child’s Healthy Eating Index-2015 Potential Range (0-100) 60.51 9.47 61.98 11.82
Child’s Body Mass Index Categories Underweight (< 5th Percentile) 1 0.7% 1 0.7%
Normal (5th < 85thPercentile) 67 48.9% 69 50.4%
Overweight (85th < 95th Percentile) 29 21.2% 30 21.9%
Obese (≥ 95th Percentile) 40 29.2% 37 27.0%
Parenting Feeding Demandingness Potential Range (1-5) 3.07 0.59 2.80 0.62
Parenting Feeding Responsiveness Potential Range (0.20-2.02) 1.22 0.17 1.25 0.18
Maternal Hispanic Acculturation Potential Range (1-4) 3.64 0.51 3.60 0.51
Maternal English Acculturation Potential Range (1-4) 2.20 0.88 2.33 0.87
Maternal Marital Status Married 78 56.9% 76 55.5%
Never married 18 13.1% 23 16.8%
Divorced/Separated/Widowed 23 16.8% 24 17.5%
Other* 18 13.1% 14 10.2%
Maternal Education Status Some high school or less 53 38.7% 52 37.9%
High school/GED 33 24.1% 38 27.7%
Technical school/ Some college 44 32.1% 37 27.0%
College graduate 7 5.1% 10 7.3%
Maternal Employment Employed 32 23.4% 44 32.1%
Unemployed 105 76.6% 93 67.9%
Maternal Body Mass Index Healthy range 18.5 – 24.9 31.90 7.20 31.81 7.20
*

Most common response to “other” marital status was ‘union libre’ which is living together without being legally married.