Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Jan 12;34(1):158–173. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1538428

Table 5.

Multiple regression equations with story memory scores predicting right hemisphere structural variables (with both psychometrically healthy and mild cognitive impairment included)

Right
Subiculum
Volume
Right Whole
Hippocampus
Volume
Right
Entorhinal
Cortex
Thickness
Right Rostral
Middle
Frontal
Thickness

Carson-Jones Delay - V F Δ 2.347 2.499 0.217 0.013
R2 Δ 0.016 0.016 0.002 0.000

Carson-Jones Delay - T F Δ 1.787 1.448 0.105 0.010
R2 Δ 0.015 0.012 0.001 0.000

LM Delay F Δ 2.864 t 2.366 0.153 0.352
R2 Δ 0.019 0.015 0.001 0.003
t

= trend significance at p < .10;

Carson-Jones Delay – Verbatim n = 131; Carson-Jones Delay – Thematic n = 110; LM II n = 132; LM = Logical Memory; Carson-Jones Delay – V = Carson-Jones Delay Verbatim; Carson-Jones Delay – T = Carson-Jones Delay Thematic