Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 13;394(10193):148–158. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31279-6

Table 5.

Immune responses as poliovirus type-2 neutralising antibody titres in the total study population

Candidate 1 (n=15) Candidate 2 (n=15)
Geometric mean titre (95% CI)
Day 0 93·3 (55·3–170·0) 52·8 (25·2–123·1)
Day 28 680·9 (367·8–1098) 575·0 (330·1–871·9)
Geometric mean fold change in titre (95% CI)
Day 28 7·3 (3·8–13·5) 10·9 (4·5–24·6)
Median titre (IQR; Q1–Q3), (95% CI)
Day 0 56·9 (40·6–147·4; 106·7), (36·0–181·0) 36·0 (22·6–81·3; 58·6), (22·6–90·5)
Day 28 1152 (650–1448; 798), (576·0–1448) 724·1 (408·6–1152·1; 743·5), (362·0–1152)
Median fold change in titre (IQR; Q1–Q3), (95% CI)
Day 28 8·00 (2·6–22·8; 20·2), (2·00–20·1) 12·73 (4·1–38·2; 34·1), (3·18–25·5)
Seroprotection, n (%), 95% CI
Day 0 15 (100%), 78·2–100 14 (93%), 68·1–99·8
Day 28 15 (100%), 78·2–100 15 (100%), 78·2–100
Seroconversion, n (%), 95% CI
Day 28* 10 (83%), 51·6–97·9 11 (85%), 54·6–98·1

95% CIs were calculated with the Clopper-Pearson method.

*

Three participants given candidate 1 and two participants given candidate 2 had baseline titres close to the upper limit of quantitation so it was not possible to measure a 4-fold increase.