Table 2.

Pairwise comparison of the fold changes in the expression level of sncRNAs in the sample groups shown in Figure 3.

sncRNA	Group 1–Group 2	p-Value	Group 1, Me(Q1, Q3) *	Group 2, Me(Q1, Q3) *
let-7b-5p	“3–10 cell embryon”–“morula”	0.04	6.16 (4.08, 7.86)	10.1 (6.42, 12.86)
	“morula”–“fair quality blastocyst”	0.02	10.1 (6.42, 12.86)	4.18 (1.94, 6.71)
	“morula”–“excellent quality blastocyst”	0.05	10.1 (6.42, 12.86)	7.24 (3.48, 10.07)
let-7i-5p	“morula”–“poor quality blastocyst”	0.02	2.2 (0.87, 4.33)	6.2 (5.19, 6.34)
	“cavernous morula”–“poor quality blastocyst”	0.01	3.17 (2.67, 3.89)	6.2 (5.19, 6.34)
	“poor quality blastocyst”–“excellent quality blastocyst”	0.01	6.2 (5.19, 6.34)	3.26 (2.18, 4.52)
piR020401	“morula”–“fair quality blastocyst”	0.02	2.12 (1.94, 2.2)	1.92 (1.43, 2.01)
	“fair quality blastocyst”–“good quality blastocyst”	<0.001	1.92 (1.43, 2.01)	2.14 (2.05, 2.27)
piR16735	“3–10 cell embryon”–“cavernous morula”	<0.001	1.21 (1.21, 1.88)	6.78 (3.97, 14.92)
	“3–10 cell embryon”–“good quality blastocyst”	0.01	1.21 (1.21, 1.88)	6.3 (3.51, 8.2)
	“cavernous morula”–“fair quality blastocyst”	0.04	6.78 (3.97, 14.92)	1.74 (1.41, 3.85)
	“cavernous morula”–“excellent quality blastocyst”	0.02	6.78 (3.97, 14.92)	2.61 (1.62, 5.62)
piR17716	“poor quality blastocyst”–“good quality blastocyst”	0.04	0.72 (0.69, 0.73)	0.88 (0.73, 0.98)
piR19675	“3–10 cell embryo”–“good quality blastocyst”	0.02	0.1 (0.05, 0.36)	1.26 (1.08, 1.63)
	“3–10 cell embryo”–“excellent quality blastocyst”	0.03	0.1 (0.05, 0.36)	1.23 (0.7, 1.5)
piR20326	“3–10 cell embryo”–“good quality blastocyst”	0.02	0.06 (0.04, 0.06)	2.88 (1.09, 3.92)

* The data are presented as medians (Me) and quartiles Q1 and Q3 in the format Me (Q1; Q3).