Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 21;11(6):1395. doi: 10.3390/nu11061395

Table 3.

Eligible mixed-methods and multi-method studies.

Author, Year, Methodology, Methods Country Participant Characteristics Years Since Retirement Validated Tool Used Key Quantitative Finding Key Themes Study Quality [17]
Greenleaf (2002) [26]
Cross-sectional, thematic analysis
USA Female; n = 6
Age: 23–31 (M = 26)
Various Sports
1–5 years Figure Rating Scale (FRS) Nil significant findings (The FRS served as an additional source of complementary information) (1) Factors influencing body image: uniforms, teammates, appearance, fitness and coaches, (2) comparison to previous body, (3) social body ideal vs. athletic ideal 33%
Papathomas, Petrie and Plateau (2018) [27]
Cross-sectional, interpretivist analysis, multimethod
USA Female; n = 218
Age: 25.72 ± 1.19
Gymnastics, Swimming
2–6 years No Years since retirement was unrelated to weight status, satisfaction and control. 55% dissatisfied with weight, 59.6% trying to lose weight. (1) Move toward the feminine ideal, (2) feeling fat, flabby and ashamed, (3) a continued commitment to a former self, 4) conflicting ideals: the retired female athlete paradox 66%
Plateau, Petrie, and Papathomas (2017) [28]
Cross-sectional, inductive analysis, multimethod
USA Female; n = 218
Age: 25.72 ± 1.19
Gymnastics, Swimming
2–6 years No Athletes expressed concern on changing body shape and weight with reduced exercise. (1) Finding new meanings in exercise (2) Negotiating exercise independence (3) Repositioning exercise in a broader life context 66%
Stephan and Bilard (2003) [29]
Longitudinal, thematic analysis, multimethod
France Female; n = 8
Male; n = 8
Age: 30.6 ± 3.7
Various Sports
1.5 months and 4.5months Body Image Questionnaire (BIQ) Decrease in body satisfaction between 1.5–5 months after retirement. (1) Weight gain and uncertainty about physical capacities, (2) awareness of physical deterioration, (3) unpleasant somatic symptoms, (4) decrease in social recognition 66%