Skip to main content
. 2019 May 6;9(2):50. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics9020050

Table 5.

Comparing Means for All Scores Combined.

Comparing Means
Collective Score, Individual Questionnaires
Simulator A
MedaPhor
Simulator B
Schallware
Simulator C
Simbionix
Simulator D
ViMedix
Educational Value
Benefits for novices 3.8 (1.2) 4.7 (0.5) 4.4 (0.7) 4.2 (0.9)
Benefits for intermediates 3.1 (1.5) 4.3 (1.0) 3.3 (1.6) 2.9 (1.5)
Benefits for advanced 2.1 (1.1) 2.7 (1.2) 2.2 (1.3) 2.0 (1.1)
Fidelity
Scans resemble real life images 3.5 (1.2) 4.8 (0.4) 2.5 (1.2) 2.5 (1.2)
Probe resemble real life use 2.5 (1.5) 3.7 (1.1) 4.0 (1.2) 3.9 (1.0)
Knobs resemble real life use 3.1 (1.6) 3.5 (1.3) 3.2 (1.4) 2.1 (1.2)
Usability
Intuitive use 3.7 (1.3) 4.4 (0.9) 4.5 (0.6) 4.2 (1.3)
Useful instructions 3.1 (1.2) 3.9 (1.1) 3.9 (0.9) 3.1 (1.4)
Useful feedback 3.1 (1.1) 3.7 (1.0) 3.3 (1.1) 2.7 (1.2)
Overall Satisfaction
Easy to use 3.3 (1.5) 4.3 (0.9) 4.5 (0.6) 4.1 (1.5)
Overall feel 2.9 (1.6) 3.7 (1.0) 3.7 (1.2) 3.0 (1.5)
Recommend it to department 2.4 (1.4) 3.6 (1.1) 2.6 (1.5) 2.3 (1.3)

Means compared using collective scores for all participants from the individual simulator questionnaires. The values refer to the Likert’s scale of 1 (least favorable answer) to 5 (most favorable answer).