Table 1.
Prescribing Elements (Potential Audit Variables) | Comments | Selected for Audit |
---|---|---|
START SMART | ||
No antibiotic if not indicated (no reasonable evidence of infection) | Unnecessary antibiotic exposure selects for avoidable resistance [9,10,11]. | ✓ |
Indication documented | Good practice for continuity of care but of uncertain relevance to resistance. | ✓ |
Appropriate specimens taken for microscopy, culture, and sensitivity (MC&S)—blood cultures and suspected site of infection | Important for establishing evidence of infection and for targeting appropriate therapy but requires manual audit and >50% of cultures are negative [12,13]. | ✓ |
No allergy or contra-indication to treatments | Important patient safety consideration but not relevant for resistance. | ✕ |
Prompt administration of first dose | Important patient safety consideration in cases of severe sepsis but of uncertain relevance to resistance. Already captured by national sepsis audits. | ✕ |
Treatment regimen adequate to cover most likely pathogens | Meta-analysis of RCTs reports increased risk of mortality if initial regimen inadequate [14]. Relevance to resistance uncertain. | ✓ * |
Treatment regimen not unnecessarily broad spectrum | Indiscriminate use of critical broad-spectrum agents unnecessarily selects for resistance [15,16,17]. | ✓ * |
No redundant agents in treatment regimen | Unnecessary antibiotic exposure selects for avoidable resistance [9,10,11]. | ✓ |
Treatment regimen compliant with local/national guideline or justified deviation | Validity dependent upon quality of local guideline. Relevance to resistance uncertain. | ✕ |
Treatment regimen cost-effective | Not relevant to resistance. | ✕ |
No underdosing | Limited evidence from modeling suggests that low doses may select resistance in pneumococci [18] but underdosing unlikely to be a problem in NHS hospitals due to pharmacist and nurse intervention. | ✕ |
No overdosing | Important patient safety consideration but likely to reduce rather than increase risk of selecting resistance [19,20,21,22,23,24]. | ✕ |
Correct route of administration | Relevant for efficacy, length of stay, and risk of line infection but of uncertain relevance to resistance. | ✕ |
Prompt appropriate source control | Subjective assessment. Of uncertain relevance to resistance. | ✕ |
No missed doses or delayed doses | Of uncertain relevance to selection of resistance. | ✕ |
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for narrow therapeutic index drugs | Important primarily for patient safety (but also for efficacy); of uncertain relevance to resistance. | ✕ |
THEN FOCUS | ||
Prompt discontinuation of antibiotics if alternative diagnosis established and infection excluded | There is RCT evidence that unnecessary continuation selects for multi-resistant organisms [25,26,27]. | ✓ |
Appropriate broadening of spectrum in response to MC&S results | This may necessitate an increase in broad-spectrum agent use if indicated by MC&S results. Failure to adjust ineffective treatment to MC&S results is associated with a higher risk of mortality [27]. | ✓ * |
Appropriate narrowing of spectrum in response to MC&S results | Evidence largely from observational studies suggests that de-escalation to narrow-spectrum agents is safe when patients are improving clinically and a plausible pathogen has been identified [28]. | ✓ * |
Prompt referral to outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy OPAT services for suitable patients | Relevant for length of stay and risk of healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) but of uncertain relevance to resistance. | ✕ |
Prompt switch from IV to oral route of administration when safe and effective | Relevant for length of stay and risk of line infection but of uncertain relevance to resistance. | ✕ |
Antibiotic plan documented in the notes | Good practice for continuity of care but of uncertain relevance to resistance. | ✕ |
No unjustified prolonged duration of treatment | There is evidence from RCTs and observational studies that unnecessarily prolonged duration selects for multi-resistant organisms [25,26,29]. Can only be audited at the end of therapy. | ✓ |
* Prescribing elements relating to antibiotic spectrum; deprioritised for audit tool prototype