Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 12;11(6):1320. doi: 10.3390/nu11061320

Table 2.

Personal factors and dietary quality among low-income applicants to a CO-CSA program (n = 64) and a comparison sample (n = 105).

CO-CSA Applicants (n = 64) 1 Comparison Sample (n = 105) 2 p Sub-Groups of CO-CSA Applicants
CO-CSA Purchasers (n = 46) Non-purchasers (n = 18) p
PERSONAL FACTORS % % % %
Knowledge
 5+ cups/day of FV recommended 51.7 24.8 0.001 53.5 46.7 0.649
 ½ of dinner plate should be FV 91.4 42.9 <0.001 90.7 93.3 1.000 3
Attitudes median median median median
Negative cooking attitudes (higher numbers indicate poorer attitudes) 2.5 2.25 0.042 2.5 3.25 0.269
Beliefs
 General nutritional beliefs 3.09 3.18 0.494 3.09 3.09 0.682
 Self-efficacy:
  for cooking and meal preparation 4.18 3.79 <0.001 4.14 4.21 0.929
  for eating and cooking FV 3.5 3.5 0.33 3.75 2.5 0.035
Home habits
 Availability of FV in the home 3.33 3 <0.001 3.67 3.33 0.062
 Accessibility of FV in the home 3.5 3 0.001 3.75 3.5 0.104
CAREGIVER DIET
 Total FV, cups/day 4.09 1.97 <0.001 4.09 4.11 0.485
 Total FV (without potatoes & dried beans), cups/day 3.71 1.52 <0.001 3.71 3.72 0.523
 Total FV (without juice), cups/day 3.97 1.61 <0.001 3.97 3.95 0.548
 Ate sweets, times/month 15.05 21.5 0.001 17.2 10.75 0.136
 Ate salty snacks, times/month 8.6 15.05 <0.001 8.6 8.6 0.649
 Drank SSBs, times/month 4.3 35.48 <0.001 4.3 8.6 0.219
CHILD DIET
 Total FV, cups/day 3.6 2.22 0.093 4.14 1.83 0.001
 Total FV (without potatoes & dried beans), cups/day 3.59 1.97 0.041 3.86 1.6 0.001
 Total FV (without juice), cups/day 3.28 1.6 <0.001 3.74 1.4 0.002
 Ate sweets not at school, times/month 15.05 22.58 0.002 17.2 15.05 0.621
 Ate salty snacks not at school, times/month 12.9 21.5 <0.001 15.05 9.68 0.229
 Drank SSBs not at school, times/month 0 30.1 <0.001 0 6.45 0.356

CO-CSA, cost-offset community supported agriculture; FV, fruits and vegetables; SSBs, sugar-sweetened beverages. Differences between groups were tested using Pearson’s Chi-square analysis for dichotomous measures of knowledge (unless otherwise noted), and with Mann-Whitney U tests for all other measures. 1 CO-CSA applicant sample size varied from 53–64 due to missing data. 2 Comparison sample size varied from 102–105 due to missing data. 3 Differences between groups were tested using Fishers’ exact tests due to small expected cell counts.