Table 1.
Advantages | Limitations | Recommendations to Overcome Limitations | |
---|---|---|---|
Cell line (cultured in vitro) | ·Maintained inexpensively ·Treated very easily ·Grow infinitely |
·Completely lack the tumor microenvironment ·Can’t maintain original cell properties ⇒Very low predictive value |
·Should be used in basic studies and very early stages of drug development ·Co-culture with cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) or immune cells will improve the predictive value |
Cell line xenograft | ·High take rates ·Slightly recapitulate tumor microenvironment ·Take short time to be established |
·Can’t reproduce heterogeneity ·Can’t maintain the original cell properties ⇒Low predictive value |
·Should be used in the relatively early stages of drug development with a large number of mice, which can reflect the inter-tumor heterogeneity |
Genetically engineered mouse | ·Recapitulate tumor initiation and early development process ·Gene of interest can be studied in detail ·Can be increased easily after establishment |
·Can’t reproduce heterogeneity of human tumor ⇒Low predictive value ·Take long time to be established |
·Should be used when investigating how a specific gene of interest could contribute to tumor initiation and relapse |
PDX | ·Partly recapitulate tumor microenvironment ·Maintain histologic and genetic features of origin ⇒High predictive value ·Can be used for metastatic model |
·Low take rate ·Very expensive ·Take long time to be established |
·Development of new immunodeficient mice and/or better methods of tumor transplantation will improve the take rates and the cost |